Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39476547›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2024

53BP1-the 'Pandora's box' of genome integrity.

Susan Kilgas, Michelle L Swift, Dipanjan Chowdhury

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susan KilgasDivision of Radiation and Genome Stability, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Michelle L SwiftDivision of Radiation and Genome Stability, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Dipanjan ChowdhuryDivision of Radiation and Genome Stability, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry & Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: dipanjan_chowdhury@dfci.harvard.edu.

Funding

Enhanced radiotherapy for pediatric glioma via synthetic lethal vulnerabilitiesR01CA284565 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Dipanjan Chowdhury, DAPHNE A. HAAS-KOGAN · 2024 to 2026
$4.2M
Elucidating the molecular mechanism and physiological relevance of TIRR mediated inhibition of p53R01CA264900 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Dipanjan Chowdhury · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
Investigating 53BP1 'dephosphorylation' as a critical determinant of PARPR01CA208244 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI CHOWDHURY, DIPANJAN · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Evaluating the mechanism by which the DYNLL1-MRE11 complex regulates DNA end resection and genome stability.F32GM149115 · NIGMS · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI SWIFT, MICHELLE · 2023 to 2024
$143k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208244NCI NIH HHS R01 CA264900NCI NIH HHS R01 CA284565NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM149115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

53BP1 has several functions in the maintenance of genome integrity. It functions as a key mediator involved in double-strand break (DSB) repair, which functions to maintain a balance in the repair pathway choices and in preserving genomic stability. While its DSB repair functions are relatively well-characterized, its role in DNA replication and replication fork protection is less understood. In response to replication stress, 53BP1 contributes to fork protection by regulating fork reversal and restart. It helps maintain replication fork stability and speed, with 53BP1 loss leading to defective fork progression and increased sensitivity to replication stress agents. However, 53BP1's precise role in fork protection remains debated, as some studies have not observed protective effects. Therefore, it is critical to determine the role of 53BP1 in replication to better understand when it promotes replication fork protection, and the underlying mechanisms involved. Moreover, 53BP1's function in replication stress extends beyond its activity at active replication forks; it also forms specialized nuclear bodies (NBs) which protect stretches of under-replicated DNA (UR-DNA) transmitted from a previous cell cycle to daughter cells through mitosis. The mechanism of 53BP1 NBs in the coordination of replication and repair events at UR-DNA loci is not fully understood and warrants further investigation. The present review article focuses on elucidating 53BP1's functions in replication stress (RS), its role in replication fork protection, and the significance of 53BP1 NBs in this context to provide a more comprehensive understanding of its less well-established role in DNA replication.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairDNA ReplicationGenomic InstabilityTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1AnimalsDNAHumansDNATP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1DNA damage repairDNA replicationDouble-strand break repairFork protectionGenome integrityNuclear bodiesReplication stress

Identifiers

PMID39476547
PMCPMC11611608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.