ArticleJournal of pediatric surgery2025
Perioperative Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Solid Tumor Resection: A Two-center Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of pediatric surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere is no consensus on the perioperative use of antibiotics in pediatric solid tumor resection. This study collected data from two pediatric centers that utilize perioperative antibiotics to varying degrees in pediatric solid tumor patients to investigate the occurrence of postoperative sepsis and infectious complications.
methodsA two-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed. Charts of children who underwent solid tumor resection between July 2018-June 2021 were reviewed. Patient characteristics, diagnosis, operative data, perioperative antibiotic use, and postoperative infection/sepsis were analyzed within 30 days of surgery. The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI) or systemic sepsis within 30 days of surgery. Fisher's tests were performed to evaluate differences.
results250 patients underwent tumor resection between July 2018 and June 2021 at both centers. The median age was 4 years [Range: 0.02-26.1]. Seventy-five percent (N = 188) received perioperative antibiotics prophylaxis (AP), while 25 % of patients did not receive AP (N = 62). Only one patient in the AP group (0.5 %) developed postoperative sepsis, while 12 patients (19.4 %) in the non-AP group developed sepsis (p < 0.0001). There were 3 SSI in the AP group and none in the non-AP group (p = 1.0).
conclusionsThe administration of AP in children undergoing solid tumor resection is associated with a reduced rate of postoperative sepsis but no difference in SSI. This could possibly be related to bacterial translocation during surgery and the seeding of indwelling central venous access catheters. Our results support the standardized use of AP in this population. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Cohort Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.