Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39476471›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Auditory gating and its clinical correlates in adults with chronic tic disorder and neurotypical adults.

David A Isaacs, Andrew Xue, Alexander C Conley, Alexandra P Key

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David A IsaacsDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. Electronic address: david.a.isaacs@vumc.org.
Andrew XueDepartment of Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, 2201 West End Ave, Nashville, TN 37235, USA. Electronic address: andrew.w.xue@vanderbilt.edu.
Alexander C ConleyCenter for Cognitive Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1601 23rd Ave S, Nashville, TN 37212, USA. Electronic address: alexander.c.conley@vumc.org.
Alexandra P KeyDepartment of Pediatrics, Marcus Autism Center, Emory University School of Medicine, 1920 Briarcliff Rd, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA. Electronic address: apkey@emory.edu.

Funding

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) -Identifying correlates of functional immunity in SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasmaUL1TR002243 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul A. Harris, Wesley H Self · 2017 to 2026
$130.7M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Neurophysiologic Correlates of Sensory Over-Responsivity in Tourette SyndromeK23NS131592 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI David A Isaacs · 2023 to 2026
$707k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002243NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS131592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 80% of adults with chronic tic disorder (CTD) experience sensory over-responsivity (SOR), defined as heightened awareness of and/or behavioral reactivity to commonplace environmental stimuli. One potential mechanism underpinning SOR is sensory gating impairment. Sensory gating is the physiologic process whereby redundant stimuli are filtered out in early perceptual stages. In this study, we compared sensory gating between neurotypical and CTD adults and determined if gating indices associated with SOR.

methodsNeurotypical (n = 31) and CTD adults (n = 26) completed a clinical assessment, including two SOR measures (Sensory Gating Inventory, SGI; Sensory Perception Quotient, SPQ), and an auditory gating paradigm while monitored on EEG.

resultsCTD adults exhibited greater SOR. Neurotypical and CTD adults did not differ in P50, N100, or P200 gating ratios. In regression analyses, N100 gating ratio was significantly associated with SGI score; the magnitude of this association was greater for neurotypical than CTD adults. No other significant associations emerged between gating ratios and SOR measures.

conclusionFindings do not support sensory gating impairment as a mechanism underpinning SOR in CTD. The relationship between N100 gating and SOR warrants further investigation. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to examine auditory gating in individuals with CTD.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditorySensory GatingTic DisordersAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAuditory PerceptionChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultEEGSensory gatingSensory over-responsivityTic disorderTourette syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39476471
PMCPMC11647855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.