ArticlePatient education and counseling2025
Developing a supportive virtual human to deliver clinical trial education for older women and other populations historically excluded from research.
Article in Patient education and counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of the Windmill Model for Mapping Older Adults' Intrinsic Capacity Using Digital Twin Technology: Descriptive Qualitative Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Digital Tools and Strategies for Engaging Patients in Cancer Clinical Trials.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to identify communication strategies that virtual humans (VHs) discussing clinical trials can use to foster positive relationships with older women to better deliver research education.
methodsA template thematic analysis and matrix analysis of 10 interviews and 3 focus groups with 37 older women identifying as White non-Hispanic, Black, or Hispanic/Latinx were conducted.
resultsVHs can foster positive relationships with older women during clinical trial education by communicating social support. At the same time, VHs should convey credibility. Factors shaping experiences of the VHs' support and credibility include race and ethnicity, comfort with research and technology, and current health status.
conclusionDeploying communication strategies that foster positive relationships between VHs and older women are crucial for optimizing the use of VHs during clinical trial education for populations historically excluded from research. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This study provides a cohesive framework guiding the development of VH clinical trial educators for older women to meet their communication needs. The framework may extend to other populations historically excluded from research and real human clinical trial educators.
fundingThis work was supported by the National Institute on Aging National Institutes of Health, Award R24AG074867 (PIs: Krieger and Anton).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.