Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39476316›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2025

Use of Direct Anticoagulants in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Review of the Current Evidence and Emerging Perspectives.

Baris Afsar, Rengin Elsurer Afsar, Yasar Caliskan, Krista L Lentine

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Baris AfsarDepartment of Nephrology, Saint Louis University, School of Medicine, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, Saint Louis, MO, USA. afsarbrs@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1369-3657
Rengin Elsurer AfsarDepartment of Nephrology, Saint Louis University, School of Medicine, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Yasar CaliskanDepartment of Nephrology, Saint Louis University, School of Medicine, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Krista L LentineDepartment of Nephrology, Saint Louis University, School of Medicine, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thromboembolic events and atrial fibrillation are common among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), and these conditions typically require anticoagulation. Traditionally, vitamin K antagonists were used for management, but the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has increased in KTRs. In the general population, DOACs are recommended over warfarin, but the applicability of these recommendations to KTRs is unclear because of risk-benefit concerns. There is some hesitancy to use DOACs in KTRs because of their dependence on renal clearance for elimination, potential drug-drug interactions, and limited data. To date, studies of DOACs in KTRs have demonstrated that they are efficient in thromboembolic events, major bleeding is rare, and drug-drug interactions appear rare. However, no guidance yet exists about the use of DOACs, reversal of DOAC action, and the pre- and post-kidney transplant management of DOACs in KTRs, and the evidence base is scarce. Thus, decisions on DOAC use in KTRs are based on expert opinion and the resources and experiences of individual transplant centers. This review summarizes 10 published studies on the use of DOACs in 741 KTRs, evaluating the side effects, efficacy, drug-drug interactions, and perioperative management compared with those of 1320 KTRs using vitamin K antagonists. Although current data are limited, DOACs appear to be relatively safe and effective in KTRs, with some studies suggesting lower bleeding rates and better kidney function than with vitamin K antagonists. However, more research with larger patient groups is needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsKidney TransplantationThromboembolismAdministration, OralAtrial FibrillationDrug InteractionsHemorrhageHumansTransplant RecipientsVitamin KAnticoagulantsVitamin K

Identifiers

PMID39476316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.