Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39476303›Full record

Observational studyCancer2025

Combined analysis of the MF18-02/MF18-03 NEOSENTITURK studies: ypN-positive disease does not necessitate axillary lymph node dissection in patients with breast cancer with a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as long as radiotherapy is provided.

Mahmut Muslumanoglu, Neslihan Cabioglu, Abdullah Igci, Hasan Karanlık, Havva Belma Kocer, Kazim Senol, Baris Mantoglu, Mustafa Tukenmez, Guldeniz Karadeniz Çakmak, Enver Ozkurt and 46 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04250129 unknown statusnot on this map

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy with radiotherapy alone without axillary lymph node dissection safe following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in initially clinically axilla positive patients: neosentiturk-trial/mf-18-03

TypeobservationalSponsorFederation of Breast Diseases SocietiesRan2018 to 2023Enrolled500ConditionsSentinel Lymph Node
NCT07643584 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

DEMAND - A Phase II Trial of De-Escalation of Axillary Management in Advanced Nodal Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2026 to 2031Enrolled120ConditionsBreast CancerArmsAxillary Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. De-escalation of axillary interventions in the management of breast cancer patients following neoadjuvant systemic treatment.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

56 authors.

Mahmut MuslumanogluDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Neslihan CabiogluDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abdullah IgciDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hasan KaranlıkSurgical Oncology Unit, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Havva Belma KocerDepartment of General Surgery, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9888-0661
Kazim SenolDepartment of General Surgery, Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Baris MantogluDepartment of General Surgery, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.
Mustafa TukenmezDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Guldeniz Karadeniz ÇakmakDepartment of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Enver OzkurtDepartment of General Surgery, İstanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet Ali GulcelikDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Selman EmirogluDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Baran MollaveliogluDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3152-044X
Nilufer YildirimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey.
Suleyman BademlerSurgical Oncology Unit, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Baha ZengelDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Didem Can TrabulusDepartment of Surgery, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mustafa Umit UgurluBreast and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cihan UrasDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serkan IlgunDepartment of General Surgery, Demiroğlu Bilim University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gokhan Giray AkgulDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Alper AkcanDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Serdar YormazDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Yeliz Emine ErsoyDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serdar OzbasDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Guven Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8019-8015
Ece DilegeDepartment of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bulent CitgezDepartment of General Surgery, Uskudar University Faculty of Medicine, Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9759-8798
Yasemin BolukbasiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ayse AltınokDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Park Bahcelievler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet DagDepartment of General Surgery, Medical Faculty, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.
Gül BasaranDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nihat Zafer UtkanDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Beyza OzcinarDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cumhur AriciDepartment of General Surgery, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey.
Israa AlJoraniDepartment of General Surgery, Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Halil KaraDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Banu YigitDepartment of General Surgery, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Medical Practice and Research Center, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7606-9352
Ebru SenClinic of General Surgery, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fazilet ErozgenGeneral Surgery Clinic, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aykut SoyderDepartment of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Burak CelikDepartment of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8626-7675
Halime Gul KilicDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Leyla ZerDepartment of General Surgery, İstanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gürhan SakmanDepartment of General Surgery, Cukurova University, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey.
Levent YeniayDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Kemal AtahanDepartment of General Surgery, Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Ecenur VarolDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Vefa VeliyevaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Berk GoktepeDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Mehmet VelidedeogluDepartment of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Niyazi KaramanDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
Atilla SoranDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Adnan AydinerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ravza YılmazDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kamuran IbisRadiation Oncology Department, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Vahit OzmenDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains controversial for patients with residual axillary disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), regardless of the residual burden. This study evaluated the oncologic safety and factors associated with outcomes in patients with residual axillary disease. These patients were treated solely with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection (TAD), without ALND, after NAC.

methodsA joint analysis of two different multicenter cohorts-the retrospective cohort registry MF18-02 and the prospective observational cohort registry MF18-03 (NCT04250129)-was conducted between January 2004 and August 2022. All patients received regional nodal irradiation.

resultsFive hundred and one patients with cT1-4, N1-3M0 disease who achieved a complete clinical response to NAC underwent either SLNB alone (n = 353) or TAD alone (n = 148). At a median follow-up of 42 months, axillary and locoregional recurrence rates were 0.4% (n = 2) and 0.8% (n = 4). No significant difference was found in disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates between patients undergoing TAD alone versus SLNB alone, those with breast positive versus negative pathologic complete response, SLN methodology, total metastatic LN of one versus ≥2, or metastasis types as isolated tumor cells with micrometastases versus macrometastases. In the multivariate analysis, patients with nonluminal pathology were more likely to have a worse DFS and DSS, respectively, without an increased axillary recurrence.

conclusionsThe omission of ALND can be safely considered for patients who achieve a complete clinical response after NAC, even if residual disease is detected by pathologic examination. Provided that adjuvant radiotherapy is administered, neither the SLNB method nor the number of excised LNs significantly affects oncologic outcomes.

Indexed as

AxillaBreast NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node Biopsyaxillary lymph node dissectionbreast cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapysentinel lymph node biopsytargeted axillary dissection

Identifiers

PMID39476303
PMCPMC11694236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.