Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39476300›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025

Visual analysis of postmortem interval estimation trends and collaborative networks: a 15-year study (2006-2020).

Chuangyan Zhai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chuangyan ZhaiSchool of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. zhaichuangyan@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1886-8708

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 22077061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Utilizing a visual analysis of the literature on postmortem interval (PMI) estimation indexed by Web of Science (WOS), this study investigates developmental trends and research hot points across each 5-year period from 2006 to 2020. Additionally, collaborative efforts among authors, countries, and institutions were examined. Research hot points, high-frequency keywords, authors, countries and institutions in relevant papers were analyzed using CiteSpace.5.7.R2 information visualization analysis software over the past 15 years. The literature related to PMI estimation has witnessed consistent growth over time. In the keyword co-occurrence network, several impactful terms stand out, including blowfly, mitochondrial DNA, and emerging concepts like virtual autopsy. Technological advancements, such as RNA stability analysis and virtual autopsy tools, have played a pivotal role in shaping the direction of PMI research. Scientific research institutions dominate the high-frequency affiliations within the institutional cooperative network. Additionally, the country cooperative network exhibits a trend of co-occurrence and multi-clustering. As science and technology continue to advance, traditional PMI estimation methods mature while novel interdisciplinary approaches drive innovation. By identifying emerging trends and research hotspots, this study provides a roadmap for future investigations, guiding researchers toward new opportunities in PMI estimation.

Indexed as

BibliometricsPostmortem ChangesAutopsyHumansCiteSpaceForensic medicinePostmortem interval estimationVisual analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.