Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39476290›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2025

Experience-driven competition in neural reorganization after stroke.

Theresa A Jones, Victoria Nemchek, Michela Fracassi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Theresa A JonesPsychology Department & Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2854-8003
Victoria NemchekPsychology Department & Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Michela FracassiPsychology Department & Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

Funding

NEURAL MECHANISMS OF COMPENSATING FOR BRAIN DAMAGER37NS056839 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI JONES, THERESA A · 2018 to 2024
$2.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS056839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioural experiences interact with regenerative responses to shape patterns of neural reorganization after stroke. This review is focused on the competitive nature of these behavioural experience effects. Interactions between learning-related plasticity and regenerative reactions have been found to underlie the establishment of new compensatory behaviours and the efficacy of motor rehabilitative training in rodent stroke models. Learning in intact brains depends on competitive and cooperative mechanisms of synaptic plasticity. Synapses are added in response to learning and selectively maintained and strengthened via activity-dependent competition. Long-term memories for experiences that occur closely in time can be weakened or enhanced by competitive or cooperative interactions in the time-dependent process of stabilizing synaptic changes. Rodent stroke model findings suggest that compensatory reliance on the non-paretic hand after stroke can shape and stabilize synaptic reorganization patterns in both hemispheres, to compete with the capacity for experiences of the paretic side to do so. However, the competitive edge of the non-paretic side can be countered by overlapping experiences of the paretic hand, and might even be shifted in a cooperative direction with skilfully coordinated bimanual experience. Advances in the basic understanding of learning-related synaptic competition are helping to inform the basis of experience-dependent variations in stroke outcome.

Indexed as

LearningNeuronal PlasticityStrokeAnimalsHumansStroke Rehabilitationbehavioural taggingmotor compensationmotor skill learningspine turnoversynaptic competitionsynaptic tagging and capture

Identifiers

PMID39476290
PMCPMC11785499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.