Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39476288›Full record

ReviewReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2025

Tracing the Lipid Fingerprints of Preeclampsia.

Suniti Vaishya, Sadhana Ramchandra Joshi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suniti VaishyaMother and Child Health, ICMR-Collaborating Centre for Excellence (ICMR-CCoE), Interactive Research School for Health Affairs, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune Satara Road, Pune, 411043, India.
Sadhana Ramchandra JoshiMother and Child Health, ICMR-Collaborating Centre for Excellence (ICMR-CCoE), Interactive Research School for Health Affairs, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune Satara Road, Pune, 411043, India. sadhana.joshi@bharatividyapeeth.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0551-7183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) is the most common pregnancy-related complication responsible for maternal mortality and morbidity. PE pathogenesis is characterized by placental dysfunction, impaired invasion of trophoblast, and defective spiral artery remodelling. Even after many years of research on PE, the etiology and pathophysiology of PE is still elusive. Our earlier studies have shown deregulated maternal and placental fatty acid and lipid metabolism to be associated with the pathogenesis of PE. Currently available lipidomics data have shown that glycerophospholipids, sphingolipid and cholesterol metabolism are mainly altered in preeclampsia. Including these five metabolites (SM C28:1, SM C30:1, LPC C19:0, LPE C20:0, propane-1,3-diol) with currently used protein biomarkers like sFlt-1/PlGF will improve PE prediction. Similarly, CE17:1 and CER(d20:1/24:1) alongwith sFlt-1/PlGF makes a better prediction of PE than sFlt-1/PlGF alone A comprehensive map of lipid profiles in early pregnancy may provide an improved understanding of disease pathogenesis and will be useful predictive biomarkers. In this article, we aimed to summarize the significance of lipid metabolism in the preeclampsia pathogenesis and altered lipidome signatures in preeclampsia. We also discuss the future scope of lipidomics in aiding early prediction of PE and future cardiovascular risk in both mother and child.

Indexed as

Lipid MetabolismLipidomicsLipidsPre-EclampsiaBiomarkersFemaleHumansPlacentaPregnancyBiomarkersLipidsBiomarkersLipid metabolismLipidomicsPlacental dysfunctionPreeclampsia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.