ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2025
Differentiation and characterization of non-thymomatous ocular myasthenia gravis children with CT.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking the diagnostic value of thymic CT in ocular myasthenia gravis.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare thymic features using unenhanced computed tomography (CT) images between children with non-thymomatous ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) and healthy children and determine the image feature cut-off values to allow differentiation of the two populations.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study involving 66 children who underwent chest CT, with 33 having non-thymomatous OMG and 33 healthy children without any abnormality. We recorded CT features of the thymus in each child, including the mean CT attenuation value, thymus area, area ratio, anteroposterior (AP) length, width (W), thickness (T), and transverse diameter (TD). These characteristics were analyzed to distinguish OMG from healthy controls. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to clarify the best assessment, and the optimal cut-off values were determined.
resultsThe mean CT attenuation value, the thymus area, area ratio, and TD were significantly different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The mean CT attenuation value was the most significant characteristic in differentiating OMG and healthy controls (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.70). Using 50.41 as the cut-off value for mean CT attenuation, a specificity of 0.70 and sensitivity of 0.82 was observed for distinguishing the two groups (P = 0.003). Optimal differentiation was achieved by combining more than one characteristic including CT attenuation, thymus area, and TD with an optional area ratio (AUC = 0.72).
conclusionsNon-enhanced CT of the thymus complemented the clinical workup of children with non-thymomatous OMG. The cut-off values of the CT features may allow robust differentiation of OMG children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39476226What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.