ReviewArchives of microbiology2024
The clinical praxis of bacteriocins as natural anti-microbial therapeutics.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ESKAPE Challenge: Understanding Resistance and Exploring Alternative Treatments.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Probiotic-Derived Bacteriocins for Veterinary Biofilm Control: Mechanisms, Evidence, and One Health Translation.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Staphylococcus capitis strain producing dual bacteriocins, capidermicin and micrococcin P1, shows broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bacterial contamination in starch-to-ethanol fermentations: Can bacteriocin-producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae offer a solution?Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Efficacy of Endolysin LysEf-9 and Crude Bacteriocin Against Multidrug and Phage-Resistant Enterococci.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent decades, the excessive use of antibiotics has resulted in a rise in antimicrobial drug resistance (ADR). Annually, a significant number of human lives are lost due to resistant infectious diseases, leading to around 700,000 deaths, and it is estimated that by 2050, there could be up to 10 million casualties. Apart from their possible application as preservatives in the food sector, bacteriocins are gaining acknowledgment as potential clinical treatments. Not only this, these antimicrobial peptides have revealed in modulating the host immune system producing anti-inflammatory and anti-modulatory responses. At the same time, due to the ever-increasing global threat of antibiotic resistance, bacteriocins have gained attraction among researchers due to their potential clinical applications. Bacteriocins as antimicrobial peptides, represent one of the most important natural defense mechanisms among bacterial species, particularly lactic acid bacteria (LAB), that can fight against infection-causing pathogens. In this review, we are highlighting the potential of bacteriocins as novel therapeutics for inhibiting a wide range of clinically relevant and multi-drug-resistant pathogens (MDR). We also highlight the effectiveness and potential applications of current bacteriocin treatments in combating antimicrobial resistance (AMR), thereby promoting human health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39476181What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.