ReviewMolecular biology reports2024
Opportunities for CRISPR-Cas9 application in farm animal genetic improvement.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- U.S. consumers' processing of information about CRISPR-edited pork products.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- Bridging precision agriculture and human medicine through comparative genetics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- CRISPR mediated PRRS resistant pigs: biological success, welfare implications, and ethical regulatory challenges for sustainable swine production.Porcine health management · 2026Review
- A 90-day safety study of meat from MSTN gene-edited Mongolian cattle in mice.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Molecular Regulation of Growth in Aquaculture: From Genes to Sustainable Production.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Genetic resistance to vector-borne hemoprotozoa in livestock: molecular markers, host-parasite interactions, and implications for breeding and control.Journal of veterinary science · 2025Review
- CRISPR-Cas9 in the Tailoring of Genetically Engineered Animals.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas9 has emerged as a powerful tool in livestock breeding, enabling precise genetic modifications to address genetic diseases, enhance productivity, and develop disease-resistant animal breeds. A thorough analysis of previous research highlights the potential of CRISPR-Cas9 in overcoming genetic disorders by targeting specific mutations in genes. Furthermore, its integration with reproductive biotechnologies and genomic selection facilitates the production of gene-edited animals with high genomic value, contributing to genetic enhancement and improved productivity. Additionally, CRISPR-Cas9 opens new avenues for developing disease-resistant livestock and creating innovative breeding models for high-quality production. A key trend in the field is the development of multi-sgRNA vectors to correct mutations in various genes linked to productivity traits or certain diseases within individual genomes, thereby increasing resistance in animals. However, despite the potential advantages of CRISPR-Cas9, public acceptance of genetically modified agricultural products remains uncertain. Would consumers be willing to purchase such products? It is essential to advocate for bold and innovative research into genetically edited animals, with a focus on safety, careful promotion, and strict regulatory oversight to align with long-term goals and public acceptance. Continued advancements in this technology and its underlying mechanisms promise to improve poultry products and genetically modified livestock. Overall, CRISPR-Cas9 technology offers a promising pathway for advancing livestock breeding practices, with opportunities for genetic improvement, enhanced disease resistance, and greater productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39476174What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.