ArticleInternational journal of hematology2025
The in vitro cross-reactivity and blood coagulation potential of recombinant porcine factor VIII in Japanese patients with acquired hemophilia A.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII) is a hemostatic agent for acquired hemophilia A (AHA). Cross-reaction of auto-antibodies against rpFVIII has been reported, although no data are available in Japanese patients. This study investigated the cross-reactivity and coagulation potential of rpFVIII in plasma samples from Japanese patients with AHA. Cross-reactivity was calculated as the ratio of anti-porcine FVIII inhibitor titer (pFVIII-INH) to human FVIII inhibitor titer. Comprehensive coagulation potential was assessed by clot waveform analysis (CWA) and thrombin generation assay (TGA) in samples spiked with rpFVIII (equivalent to 200 U/kg). Nine of 16 plasma samples (56.3%) had positive pFVIII-INH, with a median cross-reactivity of 1.2%. FVIII activity (FVIII:C) was restored to > 100% in all samples upon spiking with rpFVIII, but was weakly correlated with pFVIII-INH. CWA parameters and most TGA parameters were restored to normal upon spiking with rpFVIII; correlation of these parameters with FVIII:C was similar to that observed in controls. Overall, cross-reactivity to rpFVIII in Japanese patients was similar to that reported in Caucasian patients. Our results suggest that an initial clinical dose of 200 U/kg rpFVIII could restore coagulation potential to normal, and that FVIII:C monitoring after rpFVIII administration may be more informative than pFVIII-INH before administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.