SynthesisBrazilian dental journal2024
Long-term Implant Maintenance: A Systematic Review of Home and Professional Care Strategies in Supportive Implant Therapy.
Synthesis in Brazilian dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maintenance of Custom-Made Subperiosteal Implants: A Narrative Review of Indirect Evidence and Preliminary Clinical Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- 1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: A Single-Round Survey on Standard, Short, and Zygomatic Implant-Supported Prostheses.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- From fixture to function: Evaluating prosthetic complications in dental implant rehabilitation.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Clinical factors associated with peri-implantitis and the culture-based microbiological profile of peri-implantitis cases: a retrospective matched case-control study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Mechanical and Biological Complications Two Years After Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Clinical Study.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is review the efficacy of different techniques of home care and professional care for long-term implant maintenance, when compared with their respective standard procedures (regular brushing or mechanical debridement with curette), in changing clinical parameters, such as bleeding on probing, probing depth, plaque score and gingival index, as reported in randomized clinical trials. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic literature search of randomized clinical trials was performed using the PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and Cochrane library databases. A qualitative review was conducted to compare all the different techniques of home care and professional care for long-term implant maintenance.
resultsInitial search involved a total of 816 articles, 233 via Pubmed (Medline), 306 via the Cochrane Library, and 483 via EMBASE, while an additional 16 articles were collected through manual screening. A total of 29 articles were assessed by full-text read for eligibility and a final count of 13 studies were included in systematic review. The results of the risk of bias assessment for the included RCTs according to the 'RoB 2'. Results favored glycine powder air-polishing and ultrasonic devices over traditional mechanical debridement with curettes in improving clinical parameters. In at-home care, water flossers with chlorhexidine were able to reduce inflammation.
conclusionsEvidence points towards the use of glycine powder air-polishing and the use of ultrasonic devices for reduction of inflammation around implants, and for home care, many existing techniques seem to be able to control tissue inflammation, but the use of chlorhexidine in water-flossers seems to be a promising strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.