ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
Simultaneous comparison of three methods for bone quality assessment.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic resonance imaging-derived vertebral bone quality correlates with computed tomography-derived bone density and paraspinal muscle degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Asian spine journal · 2026Article
- Predictive value of vertebral specificity of bone mineral density for cage subsidence among patients undergoing anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion: a retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- Opportunistic Hounsfield units measurements on computed tomography scans can predict the number of prevalent vertebral compression fractures in older adults.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study aims to investigate the correlations between the T score, Hounsfield units (HU) value, and vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, and to compare their discrimination capability for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF).
methodsOne hundred and sixty-three eligible participants were enrolled (49 OVCF group,114 non-OVCF group). The T score, HU value, and VBQ score were collected retrospectively. Then, those three parameters were compared between the OVCF and non-OVCF groups and the correlations among the three were assessed. Finally, the discrimination capability of those parameters was compared by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsThe OVCF group showed a lower T score, lower HU value, and higher VBQ score (all P < 0.001) than the non-OVCF group. Correlations were observed among the T score, HU value, and VBQ score (all P < 0.001, HU VS. mean T score, r = 0.66; HU VS. minimum T score, r = 0.67; VBQ VS. mean/ minimum T score, r=-0.33; VBQ VS. HU, r=-0.45). The HU value indicated the maximum area under curve (AUC), followed by the VBQ score and then the T score. Moreover, the AUC of combining the VBQ score and the HU value was similar to that of the HU value.
conclusionsBoth the HU value and the VBQ score had superior discrimination capability for patients with OVCF compared to the T score, especially for the HU value. For patients with routinely performed lumbar MRI or CT scans, the HU value or the VBQ score may provide alternative options for assessing the bone condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39476030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.