Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39475885›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2024

SURVIVAL AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF ANAL CANCER: A STUDY BASED ON DATA FROM THE HOSPITAL-BASED CANCER REGISTRY OF A HIGH-COMPLEXITY ONCOLOGY CARE CENTER.

Wallace Henrique Pinho da Paixão, Gelcio Luiz Quintella Mendes, Débora Santos da Silva, Rosyane Garcês Moreira Lima de Souza, Rodrigo Otavio de Castro Araujo, Karina Cardoso Meira, Rafael Tavares Jomar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Local excision for anal squamous cell carcinoma: challenges in patient selection and diagnosis.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Understanding risk factors for low anterior resection syndrome in a South American cohort.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wallace Henrique Pinho da PaixãoInstituto Nacional de Câncer - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2533-4707
Gelcio Luiz Quintella MendesInstituto Nacional de Câncer - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9564-0892
Débora Santos da SilvaInstituto Nacional de Câncer - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1746-4544
Rosyane Garcês Moreira Lima de SouzaInstituto Nacional de Câncer - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5934-1567
Rodrigo Otavio de Castro AraujoInstituto Nacional de Câncer - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0033-2545
Karina Cardoso MeiraUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - Natal (RN), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1722-5703
Rafael Tavares JomarInstituto Nacional de Câncer - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-7138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnal cancer is a relatively rare disease, and there is a lack of survival data from low- and middle-income countries.

aimsThe aim of this study was to investigate the survival rates and prognostic factors of anal cancer cases treated at a High-Complexity Oncology Care Center in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 665 cases of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus/anal canal treated from 2000 to 2016. To estimate the 5-year overall survival probability and survival according to selected variables, the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were applied. To identify factors associated with survival, the Cox proportional hazards model, stratified by staging, was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (95%CI) were also calculated.

resultsThe overall survival probability was 62.20% (95%CI 57.90-66.20). Higher survival rates were observed in female cases, those with non-advanced staging, and those treated with chemoradiotherapy (p<0.001). Among cases with advanced staging, being female was a protective factor against death (HR=0.52; 95%CI 0.28-0.93). Compared to chemoradiotherapy, at least one type of treatment was identified as a risk factor: chemoradiotherapy + surgery among cases with non-advanced staging (HR=22.65; 95%CI 5.65-90.81), radiotherapy among cases with advanced staging (HR=2.71; 95%CI 1.39-5.30), and among cases with unknown staging, no treatment (HR=3.36; 95%CI 1.73-6.50), radiotherapy (HR=2.38; 95%CI 1.46-3.88), and radiotherapy + surgery (HR=3.99; 95%CI 1.20-13.27).

conclusionsThe findings support the superiority of chemoradiotherapy over other therapeutic modalities for anal cancer, resulting in increased survival and a better prognosis.

Indexed as

Anus NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilCancer Care FacilitiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRegistriesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39475885
PMCPMC11520677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.