Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39475877›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Understanding the barriers and enablers to participation in vaccine trials in a pregnant population from diverse ethnic background in an inner-city UK hospital.

Essra Youssef, Anna Calvert, Vanessa Greening, Dominique Pearce, Suzannah Wright, Emma Eccleston, Lolade Oshodi, Paul Heath, Tushna Vandrevala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Essra YoussefSchool of Nursing, Allied and Public Health, Faculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Kingston University London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2332-1064
Anna CalvertCentre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Vanessa GreeningWomen's Health Research, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Dominique PearceCentre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Suzannah WrightCentre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Emma EcclestonCentre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Lolade OshodiCentre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul HeathCentre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Tushna VandrevalaSchool of Nursing, Allied and Public Health, Faculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Kingston University London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-8445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination during pregnancy is an important healthcare intervention for safeguarding the health of the mother and their infants. Ethnic disparities in recruitment to vaccine research studies during pregnancy potentially contribute to health inequalities. The aim of the current study was to explore the barriers and enablers influencing the willingness of pregnant women from ethnic minority backgrounds to participate in vaccine research studies. METHODS AND

findingsSemi-structured qualitative online interviews were conducted with 23 pregnant women from diverse ethnic backgrounds in the UK. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed. Our findings suggest that participants perceived vaccines and vaccine research, in principle, to be beneficial to the individual and to society, and understood the value of vaccination in mitigating severity of disease and protecting the health of mothers and their infants. Apprehension over the safety of vaccination in pregnancy was common and reduced willingness to participate. For those that decided to participate in vaccine trials in pregnancy, this was seen as an act of solidarity, a way to contribute to a collective responsibility for the public health of the community. Personal and community connections and representation-seeing people from their own communities represented in in the recruitment process shapped decisions about vaccine trial participating. Trust and mistrust in health systems, shaped by past experiences of interacting with healthcare professionals were likely to inform whether they would consider participating. Practical considerations such as excessive time commitments related to study procedures, travel and organising childcare were barrier to participation. The level of invasiveness of trial procedures were also a concern, although increased monitoring during the trial was seen as a potential benefit, mitigating some safety concerns.

conclusionsOur study reinforcing previously identified barriers to vaccine participation among pregnant women from diverse ethnic communities. This study underlines the need to develop tailored interventions that focus on fostering trust with the aid of community engagement to understand cultural contexts, establishing authentic representation, and address practical considerations, to contribute to enhancing vaccine trial participation in pregnancy in those from diverse ethnic communities.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityVaccinationAdultClinical Trials as TopicEthnicityFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleTrustUnited KingdomVaccinesYoung AdultVaccines

Identifiers

PMID39475877
PMCPMC11524452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.