Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39475822›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Effects of Injury Registry Data on Policy Making, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ana Cláudia Medeiros-de-Souza, Luana Emanuelly Sinhori Lopes, Bruno Zocca de Oliveira, Edna Terezinha Rother, Lucas Reis Correia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Cláudia Medeiros-de-SouzaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9317-6424
Luana Emanuelly Sinhori LopesHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8661-7065
Bruno Zocca de OliveiraHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8795-6376
Edna Terezinha RotherHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9453-3582
Lucas Reis CorreiaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0003-4737-3293

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInitiated in 2021, a Brazilian project aims to establish a national injury registry, compiling comprehensive data on events and individuals across the country, irrespective of injury severity. The registry integrates information from prehospital and hospital care, diverse health systems lacking interoperability, and sectors such as firefighters and the police. Its primary goal is to enhance health surveillance by providing timely, high-quality information, guiding prevention strategies, and informing policy making. The project still aims to reduce long-term morbidity and mortality associated with injuries.

objectiveA knowledge gap remains regarding the effects of injury registries in relation to policies and injury outcomes. This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to answer "What is the effect of implementation and use of injury registry data on policy making, hospitalization, and mortality?"

methodsThe systematic review follows PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, focusing on studies reporting results related to the implementation and use of injury registries, including trauma registries. Outcomes of interest include policy making, hospitalization rates or duration, and mortality. Registries within well-defined administrative boundaries will be included. Data will be collected from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs, and references. Records will be independently screened by 2 reviewers, with any disagreements resolved through arbitration by a third reviewer. Homogeneous studies, with 3 or more evaluating the same outcome, may undergo meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses by registry type, injury groups, and other selected variables of interest will be conducted. Sensitivity analysis, risk of bias assessment, publication bias evaluation, and quality appraisal will also be performed.

resultsThis systematic review will run from November 2023 to June 2024. No identical review was found. Search strategies were finalized, the bibliographic search started, duplicates were eliminated, and title and abstract screening began. Of 35 studies retrieved, 85 were excluded due to duplication, leaving 50 for selection.

conclusionsThis study is timely, aligning with ongoing national efforts to implement an injury registry. By synthesizing available evidence, we will identify the potential of injury registries to guide the decisions of Brazilian policy makers.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42023481528; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=481528. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/55029.

Indexed as

HospitalizationMeta-Analysis as TopicPolicy MakingRegistriesSystematic Reviews as TopicWounds and InjuriesBrazilHumanshealth policyhospitalizationsinjury registrymortalityoutcome assessments, health surveillancepolicy makingtrauma registrywounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID39475822
PMCPMC11561427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.