Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39475815›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integration of Social Determinants of Health in Emergency Medicine: Scoping Review.

Ethan E Abbott, Donald Apakama, Lynne D Richardson, Lili Chan, Girish N Nadkarni

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ethan E Abbott *Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, United States, 1 2122416500.ORCID 0000-0002-3295-7996
Donald Apakama *Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, United States, 1 2122416500.ORCID 0000-0001-6217-1620
Lynne D RichardsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, United States, 1 2122416500.ORCID 0000-0002-5425-1601
Lili ChanDivision of Data-Driven and Digital Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4300-5760
Girish N NadkarniInstitute for Health Equity Research (IHER), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6319-4314

Funding

Addressing Disparities in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Utilization of Health-Related Social Needs and Predictive Analytics to Improve Clinical OutcomesK08HL169980 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Ethan Abbott · 2024 to 2026
$502k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL169980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social determinants of health (SDOH) are critical drivers of health disparities and patient outcomes. However, accessing and collecting patient-level SDOH data can be operationally challenging in the emergency department (ED) clinical setting, requiring innovative approaches. Objective: This scoping review examines the potential of AI and data science for modeling, extraction, and incorporation of SDOH data specifically within EDs, further identifying areas for advancement and investigation. Methods: We conducted a standardized search for studies published between 2015 and 2022, across Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, Web of Science, and ERIC databases. We focused on identifying studies using AI or data science related to SDOH within emergency care contexts or conditions. Two specialized reviewers in emergency medicine (EM) and clinical informatics independently assessed each article, resolving discrepancies through iterative reviews and discussion. We then extracted data covering study details, methodologies, patient demographics, care settings, and principal outcomes. Results: Of the 1047 studies screened, 26 met the inclusion criteria. Notably, 9 out of 26 (35%) studies were solely concentrated on ED patients. Conditions studied spanned broad EM complaints and included sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, and asthma. The majority of studies (n=16) explored multiple SDOH domains, with homelessness/housing insecurity and neighborhood/built environment predominating. Machine learning (ML) techniques were used in 23 of 26 studies, with natural language processing (NLP) being the most commonly used approach (n=11). Rule-based NLP (n=5), deep learning (n=2), and pattern matching (n=4) were the most commonly used NLP techniques. NLP models in the reviewed studies displayed significant predictive performance with outcomes, with F1-scores ranging between 0.40 and 0.75 and specificities nearing 95.9%. Conclusions: Although in its infancy, the convergence of AI and data science techniques, especially ML and NLP, with SDOH in EM offers transformative possibilities for better usage and integration of social data into clinical care and research. With a significant focus on the ED and notable NLP model performance, there is an imperative to standardize SDOH data collection, refine algorithms for diverse patient groups, and champion interdisciplinary synergies. These efforts aim to harness SDOH data optimally, enhancing patient care and mitigating health disparities. Our research underscores the vital need for continued investigation in this domain.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceData ScienceEmergency MedicineSocial Determinants of HealthEmergency Service, HospitalHumansartificial intelligencedata scienceemergency medicinemachine learningnatural language processingNLPPRISMAreview methodologyreview methodsscoping reviewsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID39475815
PMCPMC11539921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.