Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39475709›Full record

ArticleJMIR dermatology2022

Evaluation of WhatsApp as a Platform for Teledermatology in Botswana: Retrospective Review and Survey.

Erika Koh, Abena Maranga, Tshepo Yane, Kagiso Ndlovu, Bwanali Jereni, Maitseo Kuno Nwako-Mohamadi, Carrie Kovarik, Amy Forrestel, Victoria L Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Towards 'Formalising' WhatsApp Teledermatology Practice in KZ-N District Hospitals: Key Informant Interviews.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Erika Koh *Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9545-5638
Abena Maranga *Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2256-8612
Tshepo YaneSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9324-9873
Kagiso NdlovuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4175-8366
Bwanali JereniDepartment of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7082-1240
Maitseo Kuno Nwako-MohamadiNyangabgwe Hospital, Francistown, Botswana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8408-8641
Carrie KovarikDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3258-3605
Amy ForrestelDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9839-8675
Victoria L WilliamsDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3842-2693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn emerging market countries in sub-Saharan Africa, access to specialty services such as dermatology is limited. Teledermatology is an innovative solution to address this issue; however, many initiatives have been tried without sustained success. Recently, WhatsApp has been used as a store-and-forward telemedicine communication platform for consultation and education in Botswana.

objectiveThis study aims to describe the utilization of WhatsApp for teledermatology and the satisfaction levels of participating providers.

methodsA 2-part pilot study was conducted. First, a retrospective review was performed of WhatsApp communications received by participating dermatologists in Gaborone, Botswana, from January 2016 to December 2019. Sender information, patient demographics and history, response time, diagnoses made, and follow-up recommendations were collected. Second, a 12-question cross-sectional survey was distributed to health care providers who utilized WhatsApp for teledermatology during this period. Descriptive statistics were then performed.

resultsThere were 811 communication threads over the study period. The majority (503/811, 62%) of communications were consultations from providers inquiring about a specific patient, followed by multidisciplinary care coordination communications (90/811, 11%). Our in-depth analysis focused on the former. In 323 (64%) provider consultations, dermatologists responded within 1 hour. A diagnosis was made in 274 (55%) consultations. Dermatologists gave treatment recommendations remotely in 281 (56%) consultations and recommended an in-person dermatology visit in 163 (32%). Of the 150 health care providers surveyed, 23 (15%) responded. All respondents (100%) felt that there was a need for teledermatology and improved teledermatology education in Botswana. Moreover, 17 (74%) respondents strongly felt that the guidance received via WhatsApp was high quality, and 22 (96%) were satisfied with WhatsApp as a platform for teledermatology.

conclusionsThis retrospective review and survey demonstrated that WhatsApp is a quick, well-received, and sustainable method of communication between dermatologists and providers across Botswana. The app may offer a solution to the challenges providers face in accessing specialty referral systems, point-of-care education, and medical decision-making support for complex dermatologic cases in Botswana. The information gained from this pilot study can serve as the basis for future telemedicine studies to improve the implementation of teledermatology in Botswana and other resource-limited countries.

Indexed as

AfricaBotswanadermatologydeveloping countrieseHealthinstant messaginglow incomemHealthretrospective reviewteledermatologytelehealthWhatsApp

Identifiers

PMID39475709
PMCPMC10334913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.