Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39475385›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)2024

The Effectiveness of Face Mask Mandates on COVID-19 Transmission in Utah.

Alicia C Horn, Holly E Shoemaker, Lindsay T Keegan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alicia C HornUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Holly E ShoemakerDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Lindsay T KeeganDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8526-3007

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThroughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the effectiveness of face mask mandates was intensely debated. The objective of this study was to describe how face mask mandates at the state, county, and local levels differed in their effectiveness in reducing the number of COVID-19 cases in the jurisdiction where the mandate was implemented and throughout Utah.

methodsWe used publicly available data from the Utah Department of Health and Human Services. We calculated the effectiveness of face mask mandates (

resultsMost counties in Utah had a reduction in the growth rate of COVID-19 cases after enactment of face mask mandates. We found an average 11.9% reduction in

conclusionFace mask mandates were an effective way to reduce transmission of COVID-19 in local jurisdictions and in neighboring jurisdictions in Utah. Our evidence supports the use of face mask mandates as a way to prevent disease transmission and be better equipped to respond to future pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19 transmissioneffectiveness modelingface mask mandatespublic health interventionsreproduction number

Identifiers

PMID39475385
PMCPMC11556457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.