ArticleThe oncologist2025
Impact of microvascular invasion risk on tumor progression of hepatocellular carcinoma after conventional transarterial chemoembolization.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Combined imaging and serum biomarkers in CEUS-guided microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical and LI-RADS features on gadoxetic acid‑enhanced MRI for predicting complete response after transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma > 2 cm.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess tumor progression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without macrovascular invasion who underwent treatment with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) based on microvascular invasion (MVI) risk within 2 years.
methodsThis retrospective investigation comprised adult patients with HCC who had either liver resection or cTACE as their first treatment from January 2016 to December 2021. A predictive model for MVI was developed and validated using preoperative clinical and MRI data from patients with HCC treated with liver resection. The MVI predictive model was applied to patients with HCC receiving cTACE, and differences in tumor progression between the MVI high- and low-risk groups were examined throughout 2 years.
resultsThe MVI prediction model incorporated nonsmooth margin, intratumoral artery, incomplete or absent tumor capsule, and tumor DWI/T2WI mismatch. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the prediction model, in the training cohort, was determined to be 0.904 (95% CI, 0.862-0.946), while in the validation cohort, it was 0.888 (0.782-0.994). Among patients with HCC undergoing cTACE, those classified as high risk for MVI possessed a lower rate of achieving a complete response after the first tumor therapy and a higher risk of tumor progression within 2 years.
conclusionsThe MVI prediction model developed in this study demonstrates a considerable degree of accuracy. Patients at high risk for MVI who underwent cTACE treatment exhibited a higher risk of tumor progression within 2 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.