Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39475330›Full record

ArticleSICOT-J2024

Intraoperative patellar tracking assessment during image-based robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: technical note and reliability study.

Cécile Batailler, Salomé Greiner, Hanna-Lisa Rekik, Flora Olivier, Elvire Servien, Sébastien Lustig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SICOT-J, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Does patellar resurfacing matter in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with functional alignment principles?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cécile BataillerOrthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, 69004 Lyon, France - Univ Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, IFSTTAR, LBMC UMR_T9406, 69622 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3990-0906
Salomé GreinerOrthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, 69004 Lyon, France.
Hanna-Lisa RekikOrthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, 69004 Lyon, France.
Flora OlivierStryker France SAS, 69330 Pusignan, France.
Elvire ServienOrthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, 69004 Lyon, France - LIBM - EA 7424, Interuniversity Laboratory of Human Movement Science, Université Lyon 1, 69003 Lyon, France.
Sébastien LustigOrthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, 69004 Lyon, France - Univ Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, IFSTTAR, LBMC UMR_T9406, 69622 Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRestoration of the anterior knee compartment is increasingly studied with the development of personalized surgery. However, evaluating the patellar tracking during the surgery is still subjective and at the surgeon's discretion. This study aimed 1) to describe the assessment of the patellar tracking during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 2) to describe a new measurement technique for evaluating the evolution of this patellar tracking, and 3) to assess its reliability and repeatability.

methodThis monocentric study assessed the evolution of patellar tracking for 20 robotic-assisted TKA. The sharp probe was used to perform patellar tracking in all the arcs of knee flexion before and after the bone cuts. The patella positioning was recorded every 10° of flexion between the full extension and 90° knee flexion and was assessed in the coronal and sagittal planes. For the measurements of the patellar tracking, we used a sagittal view and a coronal view of the knee on the MAKO software. From these two views, the difference between the patellar tracking before and after the bone cuts with the definitive implants was measured. Two independent reviewers performed the measurements to assess their reliability. To determine intraobserver variability, the first observer performed the measurements twice.

resultsThe mean age was 68.7 years old ± 5.2 [61; 75], the mean body mass index was 28.8 kg/m

conclusionThis new measurement technique assessed the evolution of patellar tracking after TKA with good inter and intra-observer reliability.

Indexed as

Anterior compartmentImage-based robotic-assisted systemPatellar trackingPersonalized alignmentTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39475330
PMCPMC11523864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.