ArticleMedical physics2025
Monte Carlo modeling of the origin of contaminant electrons on a 0.5T bi-planar Linac-MR.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a TOPAS Monte Carlo model for a 0.5 T bi-planar Linac-MR.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Impact of magnetic fields on small field dosimetry for parallel MR-linacs.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Monte Carlo modeling of the origin of contaminant electrons on a 0.5T bi-planar Linac-MR.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn the last decade, hybrid linear accelerator magnetic resonance imaging (Linac-MR) devices have evolved into FDA-cleared clinical tools, facilitating magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). The addition of a magnetic field to radiation therapy has previously demonstrated dosimetric and electron effects regardless of magnetic field orientation. PURPOSE: This study uses Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the importance and efficacy of the magnetic field design in mitigating surface dose enhancement in the Aurora-RT, focusing specifically on contaminant electrons, their origin, and energy spectrum.
methodsThe Aurora-RT 0.5 T Biplanar Linac-MR device was modeled using the BEAMnrc package using the updated EM macros, a magnetic field map generated from Opera 3D. Simulation generated phasespace data at the distal side of the first magnetic pole plate (89 cm) and at machine isocenter (120 cm) were analyzed with respect to electron energy spectra and electron creation origins, both with and without the static magnetic field.
resultsThe presence of the main magnetic field was verified to affect the origin and distribution of contaminant electrons, removing them from the air column up to 60 cm from the target, and focusing them along the CAX within the region below. Analysis of the remaining electron energy fluence reveals the net removal of electrons with energies > 2 MeV and generation of electrons with energies < 2 MeV in the presence of the static magnetic field as compared to no magnetic field. Moreover, in the presence of the magnetic field the integral energy contained in the contaminant electrons increases from 89 cm to isocenter but is still 15% less overall than the integral energy contained in contaminant electrons without the magnetic field.
conclusionThis study provides an analysis of contaminant electrons in the Aurora-RT 0.5 T Linac-MR, emphasizing the role of magnetic field design in successfully minimizing electron contaminants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.