Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39475243›Full record

ArticlemBio2024

C→U transition biases in SARS-CoV-2: still rampant 4 years from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Peter Simmonds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "Fertile" Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 RNA More Frequently Occurred in Hairpin Loops That Determine Virus Evolution.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  8. A Pandemic-Scale Ancestral Recombination Graph for SARS-CoV-2.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter SimmondsNuffield Department of Medicine, Peter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7964-4700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the pandemic and post-pandemic periods has been characterized by rapid adaptive changes that confer immune escape and enhanced human-to-human transmissibility. Sequence change is additionally marked by an excess number of C→U transitions suggested as being due to host-mediated genome editing. To investigate how these influence the evolutionary trajectory of SARS-CoV-2, 2,000 high-quality, coding complete genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 variants collected pre-September 2020 and from each subsequently appearing alpha, delta, BA.1, BA.2, BA.5, XBB, EG, HK, and JN.1 lineages were downloaded from NCBI Virus in April 2024. C→U transitions were the most common substitution during the diversification of SARS-CoV-2 lineages over the 4-year observation period. A net loss of C bases and accumulation of U's occurred at a constant rate of approximately 0.2%-0.25%/decade. C→U transitions occurred in over a quarter of all sites with a C (26.5%; range 20.0%-37.2%) around five times more than observed for the other transitions (5.3%-6.8%). In contrast to an approximately random distribution of other transitions across the genome, most C→U substitutions occurred at statistically preferred sites in each lineage. However, only the most C→U polymorphic sites showed evidence for a preferred 5'U context previously associated with APOBEC 3A editing. There was a similarly weak preference for unpaired bases suggesting much less stringent targeting of RNA than mediated by A3 deaminases in DNA editing. Future functional studies are required to determine editing preferences, impacts on replication fitness IMPORTANCE: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the pandemic and post-pandemic periods has shown a remarkable capacity to adapt and evade human immune responses and increase its human-to-human transmissibility. The genome of SARS-CoV-2 is also increasingly scarred by the effects of multiple C→U mutations from host genome editing as a cellular defense mechanism akin to restriction factors for retroviruses. Through the analysis of large data sets of SARS-CoV-2 isolate sequences collected throughout the pandemic period and beyond, we show that C→U transitions have driven a base compositional change over time amounting to a net loss of C bases and accumulation of U's at a rate of approximately 0.2%-0.25%/decade. Most C→U substitutions occurred in the absence of the preferred upstream-base context or targeting of unpaired RNA bases previously associated with the host RNA editing protein, APOBEC 3A. The analyses provide a series of testable hypotheses that can be experimentally investigated in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19Evolution, MolecularGenome, ViralSARS-CoV-2HumansPandemicsAPOBEC3evolutionHCV RNA secondary structureinnate immunity

Identifiers

PMID39475243
PMCPMC11633203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.