ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Alternative substrate kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Nsp15 endonuclease reveals a specificity landscape dominated by RNA structure.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronavirus Nsp15 endoribonuclease: linking viral RNA regulation to immune evasion and viral fitness.Journal of virology · 2026Review
- A combined PIE-FRET and FCS assay to monitor RNA dynamics and cleavage by SARS-CoV-2 Nsp15.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cleavage sequence specificity of Nsp15.RNA biology · 2025Article
- A combined PIE-FRET and FCS assay to monitor RNA dynamics and cleavage by SARS-CoV-2 Nsp15.Research square · 2025Article
- Spontaneous base flipping helps drive Nsp15's preferences in double stranded RNA substrates.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronavirus endoribonuclease Nsp15 contributes to the evasion of host innate immunity by suppressing levels of viral dsRNA. Nsp15 cleaves both ssRNA and dsRNA in vitro with a strong preference for unpaired or bulged U residues, and its activity is stimulated by divalent ions. Here, we systematically quantified effects of RNA sequence and structure context that define its specificity. The results show that sequence preference for U↓A/G, observed previously, contributes only ca. 2-fold to kcat/Km. In contrast, dsRNA structure flanking a bulged U residue increases kcat/Km by an order of magnitude compared to ssRNA while base pairing in dsRNA essentially blocks cleavage. Despite enormous differences in multiple turnover kinetics, the effect of RNA structure on the cleavage step is minimal. Surprisingly, although divalent ion activation of Nsp15 is widely considered to be important for its biological function, the effect on kcat/Km is only ∼2-fold and independent of RNA structure. These results reveal a specificity landscape dominated by RNA structure and provide a quantitative framework for identifying interactions that underlie specificity, determining mechanisms of inhibition and resistance and defining targets important for coronavirus biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.