ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2025
The Influence of Drinking Consequences on Alcohol Expectancy Likelihoods and Valences: An Item-Level Multilevel Approach.
Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Testing the robustness of daily associations of affect with alcohol and cannabis use.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2026Article
- Factors associated with smoking and risky drinking among university students in Japan.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2026Article
- Within-day associations between affect and intentions to drink alcohol in adolescents and young adults: A registered report.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAlcohol expectancy theory proposes that beliefs about drinking motivate or deter drinking. Although expectancies influence drinking, less is known about how the consequences of drinking influence expectancies. We modeled a feedback conceptualization of how the experience of specific consequences influenced people's beliefs about how likely a consequence is to occur (i.e., likelihoods) and how positive the consequence will be (i.e., valences).
methodWe re-analyzed cross-sectional data from college drinkers (
resultsParticipants had higher likelihoods (95% CI Study 1 = [2.06, 2.43], 95% CI Study 2 = [1.75, 2.12]) and valences (95% CI Study 1 = [0.28, 0.52], 95% CI Study 2 = [0.33, 0.60]) when they had experienced consequences more often, but these associations leveled off at higher consequence frequencies. Participants also believed consequences to be more likely when they viewed them as more positive, and vice versa. Again, these associations leveled off at higher levels of the predictor. Crucially, the strength of these associations varied across both people and consequences.
conclusionsExperiencing specific consequences more often was related to people judging them to be more likely and more positive in the future, aligning with alcohol expectancy theory. This may lead to experiencing negative consequences repeatedly because people are not being demotivated from drinking. Given the person and consequence level variability, clinicians should consider an individualized approach when targeting drinking consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.