ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2024
Standardization of bone morphometry and mineral density assessments in zebrafish and other small laboratory fishes using X-ray radiography and micro-computed tomography.
Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Demystifying machine learning approaches in digital bone imaging using microCT and HRpQCT.Bone reports · 2026Review
- Coordinated Bone-Muscle Axis Association in South China Carp (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Protocol for quantifying vertebral column morphology for the statistical analysis of scoliosis severity in zebrafish.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Image-Based Analysis of Morphometric Differences Between Sea-Caught and Farmed Large Yellow Croaker (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zebrafish and other small laboratory fishes are emerging as important animal models for investigating human skeletal development and diseases. In recent years, there has been a notable increase in research publications employing X-ray radiography and micro-computed tomography to analyze the skeletal structures of these animals. However, evaluating bone morphology and mineral density in small laboratory fish poses unique challenges compared to well-established small rodent models. The varied approaches to image acquisition, analysis, and reporting across studies have led to substantial obstacles in interpreting and comparing research findings. This article addresses the urgent need for standardized reporting of parameters and methodologies related to image acquisition and analysis, as well as the adoption of harmonized nomenclature. Furthermore, it offers guidance on anatomical terminology, units of measurement, and the establishment of minimal parameters for reporting, along with comprehensive documentation of methods and algorithms used for acquisition and analysis. We anticipate that adherence to these guidelines will enhance the consistency, reproducibility, and interpretability of reported measurements of bone density and morphometry in small fish models. These advancements are vital for accurately interpreting phenotypes and gene functions, particularly in the context of multi-center studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.