ArticleESC heart failure2025
Association of BMI with adherence and outcome in heart failure patients treated with wearable cardioverter defibrillator.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), yet an 'obesity paradox' has been observed in various CVD contexts. The impact of obesity on heart failure (HF) patients treated with a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) remains underexplored.
methodsIn a multicentre international registry, we retrospectively collected data from a consecutive series of 1003 patients. These patients were divided into three body mass index (BMI) groups: <25 kg/m
resultsAt 3 month follow-up, patients with a BMI > 30 showed the greatest improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 51.4%, significantly higher than the 41.4% in those with a BMI < 25 (P = 0.017) and comparable with the 49.4% in the BMI 25-30 group (P = 0.635). WCD wearing time and adherence were similar across all BMI groups. The incidence of WCD shock was similar across BMI groups. Rates of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation and non-sustained VT (ns-VT) were comparable across BMI groups. The rate of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation was 40.3% across all patients, with a slightly lower rate in the BMI > 30 group (36.8%) compared with others, although not significantly. Rehospitalization due to cardiovascular causes was significantly lower in the BMI > 30 group (55.4%) compared with the BMI 25-30 group (70.9%; P = 0.048), but similar to the BMI < 25 group (54.9%; P = 0.957). At 2 year follow-up, mortality was lower in the BMI > 30 group (5.9%) compared with the BMI < 25 (7.5%; P = 0.029) and BMI 25-30 groups (7%; P = 0.681). In multivariable analysis, LVEF at long term was significantly associated with a reduction in mortality.
conclusionsObese patients exhibited significantly greater improvement in LVEF, which was associated with reduced mortality. Adherence to WCD therapy was excellent across all BMI groups. ICD implantation occurred in 40.3% of patients, with similar WCD shock rates and arrhythmic events across BMI groups. An obesity paradox was observed, with obese patients demonstrating significantly lower rehospitalization rates due to cardiovascular causes and reduced mortality at follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.