ArticleEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.)2023
Metadata Analysis of Persistent Organic Pollutants in National Pools of Human Milk in Support of the Stockholm Convention Implementation.
Article in Environment & health (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Hazard-Based Approach Enables the Efficient Identification of Chemicals of Concern in Plastics.Environmental science & technology · 2025Review
- Exposure-Response Associations of Ambient Heavy Metal and Persistent Organic Pollutant with All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Assessing the Impact of Serum Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Concentrations on Immune Function in an Industrialized Region of China.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- A Decade of Global Atmospheric Monitoring Delivers Mixed Report Card on the Stockholm Convention.Environmental science & technology letters · 2024Article
- Persistent Organic Pollutants in Austrian Human Breast Milk Collected between 2013 and 2016.Journal of xenobiotics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A set of human milk samples, consisting of pools from up to 50 mothers that delivered their first baby was assessed for the persistent organic pollutants (POPs) listed in the Stockholm Convention. It must be noted that only samples that qualified for the criteria, as established in the global monitoring plan of the Stockholm Convention, following an initial protocol from the World Health Organization, were included. The data do not allow for an assessment of POP concentrations in breast milk with lactation period nor, in most cases and when not indicated otherwise, a comparison within the same country. The assessment does not rank the POPs as to the risk for breastfeeding. Rather the measurements provide a basis for countries to compare among POPs or with other countries. A regional preference for certain POPs could not be identified; thus, taking into account global food supply chains and local production elsewhere does not allow us to prioritize a country for a certain POP. Although the highest concentrations were always found for the sum of DDT, these samples were not prominent in multivariate statistical analyses. The best indicator for the scale of POPs in breast milk was the sampling year: the earlier a national pool was created, the higher and the wider spread were the concentrations: see the example of dioxin-like POPs and indicator PCB. For some POPs, the income of a country seems to indicate scale and POP compounds. The population density was not found to be a suitable predictor or discriminator. Since all POPs seemed to level off and some POPs were only measured after the entry-into-force of the Stockholm Convention in 2004, we do not have a strong indicator to determine POP concentrations in the 1980s or before.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.