Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39474597›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Exploring Risk Factors for Post-operative Complications in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Literature Review.

Mina Manasseh, Islam Mt Elsamalouty, Cho Nu San, Marcos Kostalas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mina ManassehGeneral Surgery, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, GBR.
Islam Mt ElsamaloutyGeneral Surgery, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, GBR.
Cho Nu SanGeneral Surgery, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, GBR.
Marcos KostalasUpper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallstone-related diseases, particularly common bile duct (CBD) stones, pose a significant global health challenge. The emergence of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has transformed the management of these conditions by offering a less invasive alternative to traditional open surgery. This literature review aims to analyze published literature to identify and understand the risk factors associated with LCBDE. The study aims to offer valuable insights that could potentially enhance patient care and outcomes in managing CBD stones. A comprehensive search of English-language studies from the past 20 years was conducted using PubMed, focusing on peer-reviewed primary research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. From 830 initial articles, 25 were selected based on relevance and availability. The review identified several key risk factors influencing LCBDE outcomes, including patient-related factors such as advanced age, high comorbidity scores, narrow bile ducts, and complex stones, which increase the likelihood of complications. Surgeon experience also plays a crucial role, with lower complication rates observed among surgeons who have performed at least 70 LCBDE procedures over a 10-year period. Additionally, procedure-related factors such as the transcystic (TC) approach, primary suture (PS) closure, and intraoperative imaging were found to reduce complication rates. LCBDE remains a promising approach for managing bile duct stones, particularly when patient, surgeon, and procedural factors are optimized.

Indexed as

bile duct injurycommon bile duct stonescomplicationlaparoscopic common bile duct explorationoutcomerisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39474597
PMCPMC11519757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.