ReviewCureus2024
Exploring Risk Factors for Post-operative Complications in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Feasibility of transumbilical and prior caesarean scar access in single-incision laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for extrahepatic bile duct stones.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Common bile duct exploration with choledochotomy and primary repair during pregnancy: Case Report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gallstone-related diseases, particularly common bile duct (CBD) stones, pose a significant global health challenge. The emergence of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has transformed the management of these conditions by offering a less invasive alternative to traditional open surgery. This literature review aims to analyze published literature to identify and understand the risk factors associated with LCBDE. The study aims to offer valuable insights that could potentially enhance patient care and outcomes in managing CBD stones. A comprehensive search of English-language studies from the past 20 years was conducted using PubMed, focusing on peer-reviewed primary research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. From 830 initial articles, 25 were selected based on relevance and availability. The review identified several key risk factors influencing LCBDE outcomes, including patient-related factors such as advanced age, high comorbidity scores, narrow bile ducts, and complex stones, which increase the likelihood of complications. Surgeon experience also plays a crucial role, with lower complication rates observed among surgeons who have performed at least 70 LCBDE procedures over a 10-year period. Additionally, procedure-related factors such as the transcystic (TC) approach, primary suture (PS) closure, and intraoperative imaging were found to reduce complication rates. LCBDE remains a promising approach for managing bile duct stones, particularly when patient, surgeon, and procedural factors are optimized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.