Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39474595›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Evaluating the Risk of Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults Following a Fall With Concomitant Use of Anti-Coagulation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Aby Lal, Aneena Varghese, Sukhvinder Digpal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aby LalGeneral Medicine, Portsmouth Hospitals University National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Portsmouth, GBR.
Aneena VargheseGeneral Internal Medicine, Portsmouth Hospitals University National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Portsmouth, GBR.
Sukhvinder DigpalInternal Medicine, Portsmouth Hospitals University National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Portsmouth, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Falls and fractures are major health challenges for older adults in England. Despite the advantages of anticoagulants, their use in the elderly is often restricted due to concerns about fall-related injuries. However, there is a lack of clear data on the risk of discontinuing anticoagulation therapy solely due to fall risk. NICE guidelines (2021) advise that anticoagulation should not be withheld solely based on age or fall risk. This study aims to assess the incidence of significant brain injuries or intracranial haemorrhages in patients on anticoagulant therapy, also comparing the independent risk factors for traumatic brain injury. Objective This study aims to assess the incidence of TBI following falls in patients on anticoagulant therapy, comparing outcomes between those using DOACs and Vitamin K antagonists. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Queen Alexandra Hospital, University Hospitals Portsmouth NHS Trust, from November 2023 to May 2024. Data were collected from 3,468 CT head scans performed on patients with a history of falls, including 801 on anticoagulation therapy. Results Of the 801 patients on anticoagulation, 763 (95.2%) were aged 65 or older, with a mean age of 83.1 years. Acute hemorrhage was detected in 3.1% (25/801) of patients. Patients on Warfarin and Dabigatran had significantly higher TBI risk compared to those on Apixaban (6.7%, p=0.02; and 7.6%, p=0.01, respectively), while Edoxaban and Rivaroxaban showed no significant difference. Also, older age (≥65 years) and higher frailty scores (CFS 6 and 7) were associated with increased TBI risk (p<0.05). All patients with acute hemorrhage received conservative management, and two patients experienced mortality within six months.  Discussion The study indicates that the risk of TBI following falls in anticoagulated patients is 3.1% relatively low, aligning with existing literature. This underscores the need for careful consideration before discontinuing anticoagulation therapy solely based on fall risk. Hence, discontinuation of anticoagulation should be a patient-specific decision that carefully considers the balance between the risk of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the benefits of anticoagulation therapy. Factors such as age, frailty, and the type of anticoagulant should all be taken into account. Clinical judgment and selective CT imaging can help balance patient safety with healthcare costs.  Conclusion The incidence of adverse outcomes following head injury in patients on anticoagulant therapy is 3.1% and relatively low. Careful decision-making regarding the discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy, informed by patient background and presentation and selective CT imaging, is essential to manage risks effectively and optimize healthcare resource utilization.

Indexed as

clinical frailty scorect scan headdirect oral anticoagulants (doac)fall injurygeriatric fallintra-cranial bleedprophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulationprophylactic anticoagulationtraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID39474595
PMCPMC11520945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.