Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39474560›Full record

ArticleCase reports in oncology

Delayed Distant Recurrence of a Uveal Melanoma 4 Decades after Enucleation.

Nils A Eide, Agate Noer, Henrik Jespersen, Peter Jebsen, Jürgen Geisler

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nils A EideDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Agate NoerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Henrik JespersenDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Peter JebsenDepartment of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Jürgen GeislerDepartment of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This report presents a case of an exceptionally delayed distant recurrence of a choroidal melanoma, occurring 4 decades after the enucleation of the affected eye. Case Presentation: In 1977, a 29-year-old man underwent enucleation for a choroidal melanoma. At the age of 68 years, he was diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer. Although the metastatic prostate cancer responded to treatment, a persistent lung lesion warranted further examination. A lung biopsy, somewhat surprisingly, confirmed the presence of melanoma metastasis, 4 decades after the enucleation. The cells were positive for Melan-A, while no Conclusion: The recurrence of a choroidal melanoma is substantiated by the histopathological and molecular analyses, including the finding of a

Indexed as

Case reportDormancyGNA11Late recurrenceUveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID39474560
PMCPMC11521504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.