Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39474503›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2024

Surface-active microrobots can propel through blood faster than inert microrobots.

Chenjun Wu, Toshihiro Omori, Takuji Ishikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chenjun WuGraduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Aramakiaza Aoba 6-6-01, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8579, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5348-633X
Toshihiro OmoriGraduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Aramakiaza Aoba 6-6-01, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8579, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9877-5298
Takuji IshikawaGraduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Aramakiaza Aoba 6-6-01, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8579, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3573-8414

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microrobots that can move through a network of blood vessels have promising medical applications. Blood contains a high volume fraction of blood cells, so in order for a microrobot to move through the blood, it must propel itself by rearranging the surrounding blood cells. However, swimming form effective for propulsion in blood is unknown. This study shows numerically that a surface-active microrobot, such as a squirmer, is more efficient in moving through blood than an inert microrobot. This is because the surface velocity of the microrobot steers the blood cells laterally, allowing them to propel themselves into the hole they are digging. When the microrobot size is comparable to a red blood cell or when the microrobot operates under a low Capillary number, the puller microrobot swims faster than the pusher microrobot. The trend reverses under considerably smaller microrobot sizes or high Capillary number scenarios. Additionally, the swimming speed is strongly dependent on the hematocrit and magnetic torque used to control the microrobot orientation. A comparative analysis between the squirmer and Janus squirmer models underscores the extensive applicability of the squirmer model. The obtained results provide new insight into the design of microrobots propelled efficiently through blood, paving the way for innovative medical applications.

Indexed as

Janus particlemicrorobotsred blood cellssquirmerswimming

Identifiers

PMID39474503
PMCPMC11518928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.