Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39474489›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2024

Initial experience with transmural use of a new endoscopic ultrasound electric core needle biopsy device: Case series.

Antonio Mendoza Ladd, Amer Alsamman, Karleen Meiklejohn, Omar Viramontes

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07240818 (Tissue Sample Comparison Between 22G FNB Needle and a New EUS Core Needle Biopsy Device for Pancreatic Lesions), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07240818 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Tissue Sample Comparison Between 22G FNB Needle and a New EUS Core Needle Biopsy Device for Pancreatic Lesions: A Single Center Prospective Randomized Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2026 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsDiagnosis of a Pancreaticobiliary Disorder, Biopsy, EUS Guided BiopsyArmsendoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy with core needle biopsy device, EUS-FNB
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonio Mendoza LaddInternal Medicine/Gastroenterology, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8013-3545
Amer AlsammanInternal Medicine/Gastroenterology, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, United States.
Karleen MeiklejohnInternal Medicine/Gastroenterology, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, United States.
Omar ViramontesInternal Medicine/Gastroenterology, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Endoscopic ultrasonographyEndoscopy Upper GI TractFine-needle aspiration/biopsyPancreasPrecancerous conditions & cancerous lesions (displasia and cancer) stomachTissue diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39474489
PMCPMC11518627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.