ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Exploring the association between dietary vitamin A and coronary artery disease risk in men and women: findings from a US population study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is an important public health problem with negative impacts on individual health and socioeconomics. Studies on the relationship of dietary vitamin A (DVA) to CAD are limited and conflicting. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between DVA and the prevalence of CAD in U.S. adults, with particular interest in sex differences. Methods: Data from 26,449 NHANES participants were used for analysis. The association of DVA with the prevalence of CAD was investigated utilizing multivariate logistic regression models and fitted smoothed curves, and interaction tests were performed to explore potential modifiers. Results: This study included 12,748 males and 13,701 females aged 50.34 ± 17.54 years. Overall, adjusted DVA was linearly negatively correlated with CAD (per natural ln (DVA) increment: OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99). Multivariate regression analysis showed that among female participants, each natural increment of ln DVA was associated with a 22% reduction in CAD prevalence (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.89). However, there was no significant correlation in male participants ( Conclusion: DVA was negatively associated with the prevalence of CAD, and further analysis revealed an interaction between DVA and sex in terms of CAD prevalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.