ArticleHealth science reports2024
Prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in people living with HIV and on antiretroviral treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subtype-Specific Mortality and Cardiovascular Burden in HIV Patients with Steatotic Liver Disease: A Korean National Cohort Study.Gut and liver · 2026Article
- The development and evaluation of nine non-conventional lipid parameters for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in Chinese medical health examination adults: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- The advanced lung cancer inflammation index has an L-shaped association with prognosis in American adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: a cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in people living with HIV and on antiretroviral treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.Health science reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has become the most common hepatic condition globally. The prevalence of MASLD continues to increase, paralleling the consistent rising rates of risk factors such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. Literature suggests that human immunodeficiency virus-infected (HIV-infected) individuals may have an increased risk of developing MASLD due to a complex interplay of factors including antiretroviral therapy. Since the development and widespread use of effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), HIV-induced liver disease has continued to be the predominant cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. This protocol serves to narrate the methods that will be employed in conducting the published literature search for the systematic review and meta-analysis which will report on the global prevalence of MASLD on people living with HIV and on ARV treatment. Methods: The search of literature will be done using search engines or electronic databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, African Journal Online, and ResearchGate. Specific keywords will be used to search literature that has reported on the prevalence of MASLD among HIV patients receiving antiretroviral treatment, this will ensure the reproducibility of the study. Cross-sectional and longitudinal observational studies, retrospective cohort studies, clinical trial studies, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews that were published in the English language from 1990 to 2024 will be included. Animal studies will be excluded. Three independent reviewers will conduct the selection process and select studies that meet the eligibility criteria. A quality assessment tool, Downs and Blacks will be used to assess the risk of bias of the selected studies. A review manager will be used for meta-analysis of collected data and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool will assess the strength of evidence. Ethics dissemination and registration: The review will not require ethical clearance as it will only include data that is publicly available in published reports. The results of this review will be disseminated through publications. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024516814).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.