ArticleEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.)2024
Association of Road Traffic Noise with Obesity and the Role of Meat Intake: A Prospective Study from UK Biobank.
Article in Environment & health (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Noise and the heart].Herz · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging evidence has indicated the linkage of traffic noise with cardiovascular diseases, However, there's a lack of extensive studies exploring the linkage of traffic noise with cardio-metabolic risk factors such as obesity. Additionally, the role of diet in the associations remains unknown. The aim is to prospectively examine the linkage of road traffic noise with obesity, especially by focusing on evaluating the impact of meat. Participants recruited in the UK Biobank with at least one repeated measurement of obesity indicators including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WhR), and waist-to-height ratio (WhtR) were included. The Common Noise Assessment Methods of the simplified version were used to estimate road traffic noise exposure. Participants were categorized into "less meat intake" and "more meat intake" based on the median of meat intake, assessed by the frequency of unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption. Modified Poisson regression models were employed to evaluate the linkage of road traffic noise with obesity. Additionally, the modification effects of meat intake on this relationship were evaluated. The incidence risk ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of overall obesity, WC-based central obesity, WhR-based central obesity, and WhtR-based central obesity were 1.11 (1.02, 1.21), 1.09 (1.03, 1.14), 1.06 (1.02, 1.10), and 1.08 (1.02, 1.13), respectively, for every 10 dB(A) increase for noise. Compared with individuals with lower meat intake, those with higher meat intake exhibited a stronger linkage of road traffic noise with central obesity. The prospective study demonstrates a linkage of road traffic noise with obesity, emphasizing the significance of diet on traffic noise-related obesity risk.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.