Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39474265›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2024

Feasibility validation of automatic diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse from multi-view echocardiographic sequences based on deep neural network.

Zijian Wu, Zhenyi Ge, Zhengdan Ge, Yumeng Xing, Weipeng Zhao, Lili Dong, Yongshi Wang, Dehong Kong, Chunqiang Hu, Yixiu Liang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Zijian WuNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, 1066 Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Zhenyi GeDepartment of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 1609 Xietu Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China.
Zhengdan GeDepartment of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 1609 Xietu Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China.
Yumeng XingDepartment of Ultrasound, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Weipeng ZhaoDepartment of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 1609 Xietu Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China.
Lili DongDepartment of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 1609 Xietu Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2222-3147
Yongshi WangDepartment of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 1609 Xietu Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7851-1623
Dehong KongDepartment of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 1609 Xietu Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China.
Chunqiang HuDepartment of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 1609 Xietu Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China.
Yixiu LiangDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Haiyan ChenDepartment of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 1609 Xietu Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China.
Wufeng XueNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, 1066 Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Cuizhen PanDepartment of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 1609 Xietu Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7697-9970
Dong NiNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, 1066 Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Xianhong ShuDepartment of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 1609 Xietu Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: To address the limitations of traditional diagnostic methods for mitral valve prolapse (MVP), specifically fibroelastic deficiency (FED) and Barlow's disease (BD), by introducing an automated diagnostic approach utilizing multi-view echocardiographic sequences and deep learning. Methods and results: An echocardiographic data set, collected from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, containing apical 2 chambers (A2C), apical 3 chambers (A3C), and apical 4 chambers (A4C) views, was employed to train the deep learning models. We separately trained view-specific and view-agnostic deep neural network models, which were denoted as MVP-VS and MVP view-agonistic (VA), for MVP diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy, precision, sensitivity, F1-score, and specificity were evaluated for both BD and FED phenotypes. MVP-VS demonstrated an overall diagnostic accuracy of 0.94 for MVP. In the context of BD diagnosis, precision, sensitivity, F1-score, and specificity were 0.83, 1.00, 0.90, and 0.92, respectively. For FED diagnosis, the metrics were 1.00, 0.83, 0.91, and 1.00. MVP-VA exhibited an overall accuracy of 0.95, with BD-specific metrics of 0.85, 1.00, 0.92, and 0.94 and FED-specific metrics of 1.00, 0.83, 0.91, and 1.00. In particular, the MVP-VA model using mixed views for training demonstrated efficient diagnostic performance, eliminating the need for repeated development of MVP-VS models and improving the efficiency of the clinical pipeline by using arbitrary views in the deep learning model. Conclusion: This study pioneers the integration of artificial intelligence into MVP diagnosis and demonstrates the effectiveness of deep neural networks in overcoming the challenges of traditional diagnostic methods. The efficiency and accuracy of the proposed automated approach suggest its potential for clinical applications in the diagnosis of valvular heart disease.

Indexed as

automated diagnosisBarlow’s diseasedeep learningechocardiographyfbroelastic deficiencymitral valve prolapse

Identifiers

PMID39474265
PMCPMC11519029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.