ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2024
Future Directions About Keloid Scars Based on Pathogenesis and Therapies.
Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative efficacy of intralesional therapies for keloid scars: a network meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of the biological effects of various radiation therapies for keloids by single-cell RNA sequencing reveals IRF1 as a novel target in keloid therapy.Fundamental research · 2026Article
- Exploring the Complexities of TGF-β Signaling in Keloids: Beyond the Classical Smad Pathway.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells attenuate keloid pathogenesis via TGF-β1/SMAD-driven MMP9 suppression: mechanistic insights into collagen remodeling and extracellular matrix homeostasis.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2025Article
- The quality and reliability of keloid-related videos on TikTok: A cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keloids are pathologic scars that pose a significant functional and cosmetic burden. While the literature on keloid management continues to expand, the absence of standardized guidelines or treatment protocols endorsed by academic governing bodies remains a significant challenge. The pathogenesis of keloid scars is not fully elucidated. This review delves into the intricate pathogenesis of keloids, exploring the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying their formation. Conventional therapies are analyzed in-depth considering their efficacy and limitations, including surgical excision, pharmacotherapies, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, silicone-based product, pressure therapy, and light-based therapy. The emergence of novel therapeutic approaches is discussed, including pharmacotherapies, physical therapies, and biological therapies, shedding light on their potential in treating keloid scars. We also contemplate future directions in the field, encompassing the application of targeted therapies, gene-editing tools, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine, together with psychosocial support and patient education. In synthesizing current knowledge, scrutinizing therapeutic modalities, and envisioning future avenues, this review aims to provide a comprehensive reference for clinicians, researchers, and stakeholders engaged in the intricate field of keloid management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.