ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2024
Is popularity of total elbow arthroplasty in the United States decreasing? An analysis of trends, demographics, and indications.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The most influential articles in total elbow arthroplasty: bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Total elbow arthroplasty-a historical review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Total Elbow Arthroplasty Complication, Reoperation, and Revision Rates: A Comparison Between Arthroplasty for Arthritis Versus Fracture.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Current outcomes of triceps-sparing elbow arthroplasties: a systematic review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Osteoporosis Increases the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture and Loosening after Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Revision total elbow arthroplasty for periprosthetic fracture with adjunct unicortical plating and cerclage wires: a case report.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Article
- Analyzing Declining Trends, Patient Demographics, and Complications in Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Nationwide Retrospective Data Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Postoperative Weightlifting Restrictions Following Elbow Arthroplasty: A Survey of Italian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Members.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an effective surgical intervention that can be used in the treatment of elbow pathologies including osteoarthritis (OA), complex distal humerus fractures, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there is a paucity of literature assessing trends in the utilization of TEA. The purpose of this study was to identify trends in TEA utilization in the United States (U.S.) from 2010 to 2018. Methods: A query of the IBM Watson Health MarketScan Database was performed to identify patients that underwent TEA from 2010 to 2018 using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Disease coding. Patients were stratified based on surgical indication into the following groups: distal humerus fracture/post-traumatic sequelae, RA, OA, and other. Population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau were used to estimate the annual incidence and procedural trends of primary TEA for each surgical indication. Further stratification evaluated TEA trends based on sex, age, and geographic region. Results: A total of 6522 primary TEAs were performed between 2010 and 2018. The total annual volume of TEAs performed from the start to the end of this time period decreased by 33%, from 694 to 466 cases. Overall, the majority (53.9%, n = 3514) of all TEAs from 2010 to 2018 were performed to treat distal humerus fractures/post-traumatic sequelae, while 22.3% (n = 1457) were performed for RA, 10.8% (n = 702) for OA, and 13.0% (n = 849) for other. Volume and incidence of TEA decreased over time from 2010 to 2018 regardless of surgical indication, sex, and age. The greatest decreases in volume and incidence in TEAs during the study period was observed for RA (58% and 60%, respectively). The smallest change in volume and incidence of TEA was observed for OA, with a 9% decrease in volume from 57 to 52 cases and 14% decrease in incidence from 0.19 to 0.16 per 1,000,000 people. Conclusions: The incidence and volume of primary TEAs in the U.S. decreased from 2010 to 2018, regardless of surgical indication, sex, and age. The most common indication for TEA is distal humerus fractures and traumatic sequelae, and RA is now a much less common indication than it was in the past. Understanding the national trends of TEA utilization allows us to visualize changes in practice over time to highlight preferences in the treatment of various elbow pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.