ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2024
The shoulder microbiome: a systematic review and meta analysis.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Shoulder surgery preparation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Pathogen Profiling in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Virulence Traits of Clinical Isolates Before and After Intraoperative Povidone-Iodine Irrigation.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Infection prevention strategies in shoulder surgery: A survey of fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons.Shoulder & elbow · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The shoulder microbiome is an emerging field in orthopedic research. Large synovial joints which were typically considered to be sterile now have strong evidence demonstrating the presence of native organisms colonizing the joint. Many of the conditions that surgeons see and treat in the shoulder, including osteoarthritis, rotator cuff tears, and adhesive capsulitis, have unclear etiology. The shoulder microbiome is a potential source of pathology in dysbiosis states, or source of protection against pathology in normobiosis states. The purpose of this review is to characterize the published research detailing the microbiome of the native shoulder joint. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of data searches on Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SCOPUS. The following search terms were used with various permutations; shoulder, skin, microbiome, infection, colonization, commensal, microbiota, flora. The terms 'shoulder' and 'shoulder AND skin' were combined with the other 6 terms for a total of 12 searches per database. Two independent reviewers conducted the review with a third reviewer available to resolve differences of interpretation. Studies were eligible if they were human studies of patients undergoing shoulder surgery (or surgical preparation therapy) with a shoulder that had not previously been operated on, where microbial samples were reported. Studies were excluded if they were systematic reviews and meta-analyses, animal studies, cadaveric studies, studies of patients under the age of 18 and studies including postoperative shoulders. Results: The search methodology yielded 47 eligible studies for analysis, with a total of 3283 patients. Native shoulder sampling yielded positive organisms in 50.8% of all samples (95% confidence interval [CI] = 41.8%-59.8%, Conclusion: There is strong evidence to support the existence of a native shoulder microbiome. Further research is required to characterize this microbiome and correlate it to disease and health states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.