ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2024
Understanding loss of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a narrative review of current literature.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploratory analysis of shoulder motion strategies for achieving functional hand behind the back in controls and after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. A study from the LaTour group.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Decreased pain at 12 weeks post-operatively is associated with superior shoulder range of motion after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and is sustained up to two years.JSES international · 2026Article
- Preoperative Radiographic Thoracic Kyphosis Relates to Scapular Internal Rotation but Not Anterior Tilt in Candidates for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Radiographic Analysis from the FP-UCBM Shoulder Study Group.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Does glenosphere size impact shoulder rotational range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A retrospective cohort study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Functional internal rotation (fIR) can be limited after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and can result in difficulties performing activities of daily living (ADLs). The goal of this narrative review is to summarize the growing body of research on optimizing fIR after RSA that may be useful to clinical practice. Methods: A narrative review of recent literature on IR after RSA. Results: IR required for ADLs is a compound motion involving multiple joints and planes; for this reason, the term "functional internal rotation" can be used to differentiate this motion from glenohumeral IR. Measuring IR by vertebral level is limited by interobserver reliability and poor correlation with the ability to perform ADLs. IR-specific scores or questions may be more relevant. Patient-based factors that influence IR include body mass index, thoracic spine sagittal alignment, humeral torsion, preoperative humerothoracic extension, and scapulothoracic mobility. Surgically, a healed subscapularis repair appears to improve IR and anterior latissimus dorsi transfers have been described with favorable results. Tools to predict IR after RSA are emerging and may be helpful to counseling patients on implant selection. Conclusion: FIR after RSA is optimized by maximizing impingement-free arc of motion and subscapularis repair in patients with mobile scapulothoracic joints, adequate preoperative humerothoracic extension, and low body mass index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.