ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2024
Acromioclavicular joint biomechanics: a systematic review.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Swedish trends in excision arthroplasty of the acromioclavicular joint during 2008-2023: a population-based register study.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- More Fixation, Better Outcome? Evaluating the Role of Additional Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction in AC Joint Injuries: A Multicenter Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Critical role of the acromioclavicular ligament in posterior stability: a paradigm shift in acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2025Article
- Autologous Long Head of Biceps Tendon With High-Strength Suture for Reconstruction of Coracoclavicular Ligament.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Article
- Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction With Semitendinosus Allograft: The X's Technique.Video journal of sports medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the available literature on the biomechanical characteristics of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint to identify trends in translational parameters and contributions of the various ligamentous structures supporting the joint. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases until October 2023 to identify articles reporting on the biomechanical characteristics of the AC joint. Non cadaveric or projects involving reconstruction were excluded. Consistent parameters evaluated were anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior translation. The data were extracted from the included articles and summarized. Results: 11 biomechanical papers were reviewed from six different countries - United States (n = 6), France (n = 1), Austria (n = 1), Thailand (n = 1), United Kingdom (n = 1), and Japan (n = 1). The total number of specimens included across the reviewed papers was 141. All 11 papers reported the data on an intact model (coracoclavicular and AC ligaments intact). Seven papers assessed the translational results of the AC sectioned condition, finding a greater increase in anterior-posterior (AP) laxity relative to SI. 3 papers evaluated coracoclavicular ligament sectioning, finding increased superior-inferior laxity relative to AP. Only one study involved ligament sectioning isolating the anterior-inferior bundle of the AC joint. Conclusion: This review highlights the key AP and superior-inferior constraints of both the intact and ligament sectioned AC joint. The inconsistency of AC joint testing parameters and the lack of thorough translation studies indicate a necessity for increased attention in the overall assessment of shoulder stability to close the gap in the foundational biomechanical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.