ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2024
Biomechanical and clinical outcomes after distal biceps tendon reattachment using an endo button technique and an interference screw.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconstruction of chronic distal biceps tendon rupture using dual hamstring autograft in a professional athlete: a case report and review of the literature.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Hybrid Tightrope-PEEK Dual Fixation for Distal Biceps Tendon Reinsertion in High-Performance Athletes: A Prospective Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Biceps Tendon Rupture: Contemporary Evidence, Evolving Techniques, and a Mechanics-to-Management Clinical Framework.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rupture of the long head of the distal bifid biceps tendon is a rare injury, for which surgical anatomical repair should be considered in active patients. The aim of this study was to review our patients who benefited from the EndoButton technique via a single anterior approach, comparing the clinical outcomes with the contralateral uninjured side and assessing their quality of life. Our hypothesis was that an "anatomical" insertion, through an anterior approach, by reinserting the 2 distinct tendons on the radial tuberosity, would restore the supination ability of the forearm more effectively than flexion strength. Methods: This study included 25 patients who underwent surgery between June 2015 and January 2021. All patients underwent distal biceps reattachment using an endo-osseous fixation technique with the same device. Each patient completed a quality-of-life questionnaire and participated in biomechanical performance tests. Results: We observed a significant 14% reduction in strength during flexion on the operated side compared to the healthy side. However, no significant differences in strength were found for supination, extension, and pronation between the operated and nonoperated limbs in these same patients. In terms of endurance, flexion on the operated side tended to exhibit greater endurance than on the healthy side, while endurance in supination appeared similar between the operated and healthy sides. This finding held irrespective of whether the operated limb was dominant or nondominant. We also discovered a strong correlation between the time elapsed since surgery and differences in strength during both flexion and supination. Conclusion: The ultimate goal is to achieve an anatomical surgical repair to restore all functions and maximize patient outcomes. As demonstrated, we have obtained good clinical results with EndoButton repair and a single anterior approach. The results in terms of strength and endurance are similar to those reported in the literature, and all our patients are satisfied. No postoperative complications were found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.