Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39474177›Full record

ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2024

Biomechanical and clinical outcomes after distal biceps tendon reattachment using an endo button technique and an interference screw.

Antoine Vanderlinden, Romain Carlat, Bruno Vincent, Christine Detrembleur, Serge Ayong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antoine VanderlindenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Clinique Saint Anne Saint Remy, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Romain CarlatDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Clinique Saint Pierre, Ottignies, Belgium.
Bruno VincentDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Clinique Saint Pierre, Ottignies, Belgium.
Christine DetrembleurFaculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Clinique universitaire Saint Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Serge AyongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Clinique Saint Pierre, Ottignies, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rupture of the long head of the distal bifid biceps tendon is a rare injury, for which surgical anatomical repair should be considered in active patients. The aim of this study was to review our patients who benefited from the EndoButton technique via a single anterior approach, comparing the clinical outcomes with the contralateral uninjured side and assessing their quality of life. Our hypothesis was that an "anatomical" insertion, through an anterior approach, by reinserting the 2 distinct tendons on the radial tuberosity, would restore the supination ability of the forearm more effectively than flexion strength. Methods: This study included 25 patients who underwent surgery between June 2015 and January 2021. All patients underwent distal biceps reattachment using an endo-osseous fixation technique with the same device. Each patient completed a quality-of-life questionnaire and participated in biomechanical performance tests. Results: We observed a significant 14% reduction in strength during flexion on the operated side compared to the healthy side. However, no significant differences in strength were found for supination, extension, and pronation between the operated and nonoperated limbs in these same patients. In terms of endurance, flexion on the operated side tended to exhibit greater endurance than on the healthy side, while endurance in supination appeared similar between the operated and healthy sides. This finding held irrespective of whether the operated limb was dominant or nondominant. We also discovered a strong correlation between the time elapsed since surgery and differences in strength during both flexion and supination. Conclusion: The ultimate goal is to achieve an anatomical surgical repair to restore all functions and maximize patient outcomes. As demonstrated, we have obtained good clinical results with EndoButton repair and a single anterior approach. The results in terms of strength and endurance are similar to those reported in the literature, and all our patients are satisfied. No postoperative complications were found.

Indexed as

Clinical evaluationDistal biceps ruptureDistal biceps tendonElbowEndoButton techniqueSingle anterior incision

Identifiers

PMID39474177
PMCPMC11514079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.