ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2024
High rates of return to sport after suprascapular nerve decompression: an updated systematic review.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Suprascapular Nerve Entrapment: Current Concepts and Recent Advances.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suprascapular nerve decompression (SSND) remains a controversial procedure. In 2018, Momaya et al published the first systematic review of SSND noting satisfactory outcomes with low rates of complications; however, numerous studies published since have noted no benefit in routinely adding SSND to other arthroscopic surgeries, contributing to existing contention regarding the procedure. The purpose of this study is to provide an updated assessment of outcomes after SSND. Methods: To conduct this updated systematic review, a search of PubMed (MEDLINE) for relevant studies published prior to January 21, 2023 was conducted. Outcomes including patient-reported clinical outcomes, return to sport, preoperative and postoperative electrodiagnostic testing, and adverse events were collected and pooled for assessment. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they met Momaya et al's inclusion criteria and/or reported outcomes following SSND at either the suprascapular notch or spinoglenoid notch. Results: In total, 730 patients from 33 studies were eligible for inclusion. All patient-reported outcome measure scores including American Shoulder Elbow Surgeon Standardized Shoulder Assessment; Constant-Murley score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; Subjective Shoulder Value; University of California-Los Angeles shoulder; and visual analog scale pain scores improved significantly postoperatively, with improvements ranging from 53.5% to 102.6% of preoperative values. Ultimately, 98% (n = 90/92) of patients returned to sport or military duty and 96% of these patients returned at their previous level of activity (n = 48/50) without heterogeneity among rates between studies ( Conclusion: Suprascapular neuropathy treated with SSND significantly improves patient-reported outcomes and is noninferior to similar procedures without SSND. Appropriate clinical diagnosis of suprascapular neuropathy is required as opposed to a routine adjunct procedure with other arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Ultimately, SSND is associated with high rates of return to sport and relatively low rates of adverse events; however, the risk of continued symptoms and electrodiagnostic test-related complications is an important point on preoperative counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.