Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39474045›Full record

ReviewBrain communications2024

Brain state identification and neuromodulation to promote recovery of consciousness.

Glenn J M van der Lande, Diana Casas-Torremocha, Arnau Manasanch, Leonardo Dalla Porta, Olivia Gosseries, Naji Alnagger, Alice Barra, Jorge F Mejías, Rajanikant Panda, Fabio Riefolo and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Glenn J M van der LandeGIGA-Consciousness, Coma Science Group, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0518-2571
Diana Casas-TorremochaInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Clinical and Experimental Neuroscience, Barcelona 08036, Spain.
Arnau ManasanchInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Clinical and Experimental Neuroscience, Barcelona 08036, Spain.
Leonardo Dalla PortaInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Clinical and Experimental Neuroscience, Barcelona 08036, Spain.
Olivia GosseriesGIGA-Consciousness, Coma Science Group, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium.
Naji AlnaggerGIGA-Consciousness, Coma Science Group, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium.
Alice BarraGIGA-Consciousness, Coma Science Group, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium.
Jorge F MejíasSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098XH, Netherlands.
Rajanikant PandaGIGA-Consciousness, Coma Science Group, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium.
Fabio RiefoloBarcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona 08028, Spain.
Aurore ThibautGIGA-Consciousness, Coma Science Group, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium.
Vincent BonhommeDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Liege University Hospital, Liege 4000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6356-547X
Bertrand ThirionInria, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris 91120, France.
Francisco ClascaDepartment of Anatomy and Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid 28029, Spain.
Pau GorostizaBarcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona 08028, Spain.
Maria V Sanchez-VivesInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Clinical and Experimental Neuroscience, Barcelona 08036, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8437-9083
Gustavo DecoInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona 08010, Spain.
Steven LaureysGIGA-Consciousness, Coma Science Group, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium.
Gorka Zamora-LópezComputational Neuroscience Group, Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona 08018, Spain.
Jitka AnnenGIGA-Consciousness, Coma Science Group, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental and clinical studies of consciousness identify brain states (i.e. quasi-stable functional cerebral organization) in a non-systematic manner and largely independent of the research into brain state modulation. In this narrative review, we synthesize advances in the identification of brain states associated with consciousness in animal models and physiological (sleep), pharmacological (anaesthesia) and pathological (disorders of consciousness) states of altered consciousness in humans. We show that in reduced consciousness the frequencies in which the brain operates are slowed down and that the pattern of functional communication is sparser, less efficient, and less complex. The results also highlight damaged resting-state networks, in particular the default mode network, decreased connectivity in long-range connections and especially in the thalamocortical loops. Next, we show that therapeutic approaches to treat disorders of consciousness, through pharmacology (e.g. amantadine, zolpidem), and (non-) invasive brain stimulation (e.g. transcranial direct current stimulation, deep brain stimulation) have shown partial effectiveness in promoting consciousness recovery. Although some features of conscious brain states may improve in response to neuromodulation, targeting often remains non-specific and does not always lead to (behavioural) improvements. The fields of brain state identification and neuromodulation of brain states in relation to consciousness are showing fascinating developments that, when integrated, might propel the development of new and better-targeted techniques for disorders of consciousness. We here propose a therapeutic framework for the identification and modulation of brain states to facilitate the interaction between the two fields. We propose that brain states should be identified in a predictive setting, followed by theoretical and empirical testing (i.e. in animal models, under anaesthesia and in patients with a disorder of consciousness) of neuromodulation techniques to promote consciousness in line with such predictions. This framework further helps to identify where challenges and opportunities lay for the maturation of brain state research in the context of states of consciousness. It will become apparent that one angle of opportunity is provided through the addition of computational modelling. Finally, it aids in recognizing possibilities and obstacles for the clinical translation of these diagnostic techniques and neuromodulation treatment options across both the multimodal and multi-species approaches outlined throughout the review.

Indexed as

anaesthesiaanimal modelsbrain states(disorders of) consciousnessneuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID39474045
PMCPMC11520929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.