ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024
Reirradiation of Utracentrally Located Thoracic Tumors Using a 10-Fraction Hypofractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Course: A Detailed Dosimetric Analysis.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Re-irradiation in central lung cancer-a monocentric detailed analysis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Re-evaluating previous dose and allowing increasing recovery (REPAIR): study protocol for a thoracic reirradiation phase I dose escalation trial.BMC cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: There is very little information detailing outcomes and toxicity following reirradiation for ultracentrally located thoracic tumors, and detailed dosimetric data are nonexistent. These data are critical for the safe management of these extremely difficult cases. Methods and Materials: The records of 15 individuals undergoing 10-fraction hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy for the management of ultracentrally located thoracic tumors between 2009 and 2020 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment outcomes and toxicity were analyzed. A detailed dosimetric analysis of treatment plans and centrally located organs at risk (OARs) from the initial reirradiation and cumulative radiation therapy courses were presented. Results: At a median follow up of 10 months, the 1- and 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control were 52% and 28%, 33% and 28%, and 76% and 61%, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were low, with 5 individuals (33%) developing ≥grade 2 pneumonitis (grade 2 = 4, grade 3 = 1). Dosimetric parameters were not associated with the development of clinically relevant pneumonitis. No adverse events involving central OARs (esophagus, great vessels, and primary bronchial tree) were identified. The median cumulative mean lung dose was 24 Gy equivalent total doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) (range, 10-33 Gy), with a volume receiving 20 G (V20) of 33% (range, 11%-51%). The median esophageal, primary bronchial tree, and great vessel maximum doses (Dmax) were 93.2 Gy (EQD2) (range, 50-148 Gy), 163 Gy (range, 77-204 Gy), and 191 Gy (range, 129-262 Gy), respectively. Conclusions: The current investigation is the first to provide detailed cumulative dosimetric data from a cohort of patients comprised entirely of ultracentrally located thoracic tumors. Despite unfavorable anatomic tumor location, given an intimate association with critical OARs, delivering an ablative dose with a 10-fraction hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy course can serve as a feasible option for these challenging cases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.