ArticleEplasty2024
Effect of Tissue Expanders Filled With Saline Versus Air on Longitudinal Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.
Article in Eplasty, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intraoperative expansion with air, as compared with saline, has been associated with fewer first-stage complications in 2-stage expander-implant breast reconstruction. However, longitudinal reconstructive outcomes, postoperative medication use indicating pain or discomfort, as well as patient-reported outcome measures after intraoperative air versus saline fill have not yet been investigated. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort investigation of 69 patients who underwent 2-stage expander-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix in 2017 and 2018. Patients underwent intraoperative tissue expander (TE) fill with air or saline during stage 1 of reconstruction and underwent expander-implant exchange in stage 2. Air versus saline cohorts were compared with regards to time to definitive reconstruction and postoperative pain/opioid use. Results: Of the 69 patients studied, 47 (68.1%) had tissue expanders filled with air and 22 (31.9%) filled with saline. In multivariable regression analysis, air-filled TEs were associated with significantly lower odds of requiring an opioid prescription refill (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.27; Conclusions: Intraoperative air versus saline TE fill appears to impact longitudinal reconstructive outcomes in expander-implant based reconstruction. Our results demonstrated that air-filled TEs were associated with significantly lower odds of opioid refills and breast pain. Our study also indicates that timing and office visits between stages do not appear to be affected by TE fill medium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39474002PMC11520362What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.