ArticleJournal of nonlinear science2020
Effects of Neuromodulation on Excitatory-Inhibitory Neural Network Dynamics Depend on Network Connectivity Structure.
Article in Journal of nonlinear science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic cholinergic signaling differentially desynchronizes cortical microcircuits dependent on modulation rate and network connectivity.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- H- and m-channel overexpression promotes seizure-like events by impairing the ability of inhibitory neurons to process correlated inputs.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Downmodulation of Potassium Conductances Induces Epileptic Seizures in Cortical Network Models Via Multiple Synergistic Factors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Intrinsic neural diversity quenches the dynamic volatility of neural networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Synchronization and oscillation behaviors of excitatory and inhibitory populations with spike-timing-dependent plasticity.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Modeling cortical synaptic effects of anesthesia and their cholinergic reversal.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Neurostimulation stabilizes spiking neural networks by disrupting seizure-like oscillatory transitions.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The role of node dynamics in shaping emergent functional connectivity patterns in the brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020Article
- Inhibitory Network Bistability Explains Increased Interneuronal Activity Prior to Seizure Onset.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2019Article
- Effects of Cholinergic Neuromodulation on Thalamocortical Rhythms During NREM Sleep: A Model Study.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acetylcholine (ACh), one of the brain's most potent neuromodulators, can affect intrinsic neuron properties through blockade of an M-type potassium current. The effect of ACh on excitatory and inhibitory cells with this potassium channel modulates their membrane excitability, which in turn affects their tendency to synchronize in networks. Here, we study the resulting changes in dynamics in networks with inter-connected excitatory and inhibitory populations (E-I networks), which are ubiquitous in the brain. Utilizing biophysical models of E-I networks, we analyze how the network connectivity structure in terms of synaptic connectivity alters the influence of ACh on the generation of synchronous excitatory bursting. We investigate networks containing all combinations of excitatory and inhibitory cells with high (Type I properties) or low (Type II properties) modulatory tone. To vary network connectivity structure, we focus on the effects of the strengths of inter-connections between excitatory and inhibitory cells (E-I synapses and I-E synapses), and the strengths of intra-connections among excitatory cells (E-E synapses) and among inhibitory cells (I-I synapses). We show that the presence of ACh may or may not affect the generation of network synchrony depending on the network connectivity. Specifically, strong network inter-connectivity induces synchronous excitatory bursting regardless of the cellular propensity for synchronization, which aligns with predictions of the PING model. However, when a network's intra-connectivity dominates its inter-connectivity, the propensity for synchrony of either inhibitory or excitatory cells can determine the generation of network-wide bursting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.